egafd.com

Hi,
The chairman of the Conservative Association that covers David Cameron's Witney constituency has been found dead in mysterious circumstances in a VIP toilet at Glastonbury.

He had written a memo about the members of the Witney Conservative Association which had been leaked and then published in yesterday?s Mail on Sunday, Mr Shale had said the Tories were seen as ?voracious, crass, always on the take?.

Shale received a call from No 10 Downing Street about the report. 20 hours later he was found dead in a toilet. One report claimed that it was a heart attack. Another report stated that it was possibly suicide.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... l?ITO=1490

My belief is that:

1. Shale crossed the line by criticising David Cameron's own Constituency Conservative Association.
2. After refusing to retract his memo, in response to the call from no 10, which was later published in the Mail, he was killed by an M15 hit squad and dumped in the VIP toilet.
3. Because it was a VIP toilet in a special VIP area where most people either had their own toilet or ate so little that they dont need to go to the toilet more than once a week. This is why the body wasn't found for a considerable period of time.
4. Michael Eavis who owns the land on which the festival takes place is an MI5 operative. The story about the suicide came from him. How could an ageing hippy like Eavis get so much expensive land, if he wasn't an MI5 operative or a banker?
5. A number of helicopters were seen hovering over the area during the festival. MI5 operatives being flown in and out having carried out the foul deed?
6. The cause of death has still not been identifed.

What do fellow forumites think about my theory?

Cheers
D

I think the overweight middle aged man probably had a heart attack.

What do fellow forumites think about my theory?

Well, I for one think you are depressingly predictable! Is there NOTHING you wont attempt to twist in order to gain some pathetic political point? A man has died, but you're too shallow to leave it at that. No, it's a topic for jest and mirth. The sad thing is that you are willing to urinate on someones still warm corpse for fun, just because the guy is a Tory. God preserve us from seeing you if someone on this forum you don't like, passes away!

[img]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_49Fh_exbSJM/T ... Dancer.jpg[/img]

As the self-elected spokeman for New Labour on this forum, you should at least pretend to be a decent human being and set an example of fairness and sympathy to your followers. At least for a day or so!

I agree with Jim, I also think your a sick fuck.

You seem very angry, Jimbo. But then you always seem incredibly angry.

Did I say anywhere that the death of Christopher Shale was anything other than tragic? Of course it is tragic. His family were there at Glastonbury. Clearly it was a dreadful shock to his loved ones.

His death is tragic, in the same way that the deaths of the people in the Twin Towers collapse was tragic. Would you agree with that?

His death is no more nor less tragic than the death of government scientist, Dr. David Kelly who bravely and correctly spoke out against the dodgy dossier?

Jimbo, did you state

"Is there NOTHING you wont attempt to twist in order to gain some pathetic political point?" and "The sad thing is that you are willing to urinate on someones still warm corpse for fun,"

at all those who posted that American spooks brought down the Twin Towers as an excuse to invade Afghanistan? No, you did not.

Alternatively did anyone say to you on this forum "stop urinating on the corpses of the 9/11 disaster, Jimbo". "Stop urinating on the memory of the American soldiers who died in Afghanistan by stating that it was American spooks that carried out the 9/11 attack?"

No? Why not, Jimbo?

My post is about the power of mythology and the hurt it does, either intentionally or unintentionally.

And do calm down!

CHeers
D

PS Wasnt it the Sun that used the phrase about "willing to urinate on someones' still warm corpse" ?

David Kelly anyone?

"I agree with Jim, I also think your a sick fuck."

So why did you not call Jim a sick fuck for making his "political point" about American imperialism here

http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=3&i=247020&t=247018

My argument about Christopher Shale appears very unlikely. Jim's argument about the Twin Towers appears very unlikely.

Is the pain caused by outlandish stories any less for Christopher Shale's family than it is for the families of the Twin Towers' dead?

Replace the "political point" about American imperialism which Jimbo doesnt like with the perceived "political point" Jim makes about my not supporting the Tories, what's the difference?

So I repeat, Lizard. Why don't you think Jimbo is a sick fuck for "urinating" on the memories of dead American soldiers' families by arguing that it was their own government that carried out the 9/11 attack in order to get the US into Afghanistan?

Cheers
D

Quite

I blame Bono. Would never had happened with a decent headline act !happy!

No you Looney, I said I agree with Jim. I just called you a sick fuck because I could, it had nothing to do with your post, you musn't worry, I'm just in a bad mood.