Mark Duggan shooting
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 6:56 am
It's been the good and the bad this last week with regard to our police.
On the one hand, we have had two brave, unarmed policewomen slaughtered just answering a burglary call. On the other hand, we have some very dodgy details emerging re. the Mark Duggan shooting which sparked off the Tottenham riots.
At the trial of the guy accused of giving Duggan an illegal firearm, a policeman who was there when Duggan was shot, described how Duggan pulled out a gun. Strangely, in the short form report he supplied soon after the incident, there was no mention whatsoever of Duggan pulling the gun out. Wouldnt that be the key thing you would mention in a short report about how a suspect got killed?
The officer also told the court he omitted the fact Mr Duggan was armed from his initial statement after meeting lawyers and Police Federation representatives. When asked if this was a deliberate act, he said: "I don't know."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-19662526
Secondly, a police firearms officer who attended the police shooting of Mark Duggan was told not to make a statement for more than three months
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-19647154
There seems to be an element of getting the story straight before making statements about who exactly did what.
Thirdly there is the issue about the police seals on the vehicle Duggan travelled in being broken.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-19704020
This is all beginning to look rather dodgy.
On the one hand, we have had two brave, unarmed policewomen slaughtered just answering a burglary call. On the other hand, we have some very dodgy details emerging re. the Mark Duggan shooting which sparked off the Tottenham riots.
At the trial of the guy accused of giving Duggan an illegal firearm, a policeman who was there when Duggan was shot, described how Duggan pulled out a gun. Strangely, in the short form report he supplied soon after the incident, there was no mention whatsoever of Duggan pulling the gun out. Wouldnt that be the key thing you would mention in a short report about how a suspect got killed?
The officer also told the court he omitted the fact Mr Duggan was armed from his initial statement after meeting lawyers and Police Federation representatives. When asked if this was a deliberate act, he said: "I don't know."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-19662526
Secondly, a police firearms officer who attended the police shooting of Mark Duggan was told not to make a statement for more than three months
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-19647154
There seems to be an element of getting the story straight before making statements about who exactly did what.
Thirdly there is the issue about the police seals on the vehicle Duggan travelled in being broken.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-19704020
This is all beginning to look rather dodgy.