egafd.com

You'd think that pretty much every type of 'themed' video series had been done, particularly with companies like Red Light District only doing themed vids (stuff like internal cum shots, snowballing, white on black, black on white, etc etc...) but I have yet to see a series specialising in 'unaltered' girls. I don't just mean natural tits, I mean no tattoos or visible piercings (with even earrings removed), no surgery scars, etc. There seems to be a huge market for this - American reviewers are constantly bemoaning tattoos on girls, ugly caesarian or appendix scars, etc - yet no-one has tried marketing a series with 100%-as-nature-intended bodies as its theme. OK, so it's not going to be easy finding British or American girls that fit the bill (less of a problem in Eastern Europe where tattoos are rare given their 'mafia' connotations), but if they can be found I think the potential market for such a title/series is huge. I'll be first in the queue for a copy.

Yeah....sounds good to me. And probably means you'll get younger girls too - sounds like a winner!

I,m sure you just offended at least 3/4 of the girls connected to this site, your post suggest,s in your "perfect world" nobody
would have any tatoo,s or scars, birth marks, defects of the skin, stretch marks, moles! It,s only my opinion of course but,
you should re-think your posting, or better still, maybe it will get removed.

I don't see why any model should be offended by this post. "Totally natural" is only one particular look.

I think you're being a bit politically correct. That must be a first on this board !!!

Andy.

'Snowballing'?

Read it again Andy:


'unaltered' girls. I don't just mean natural tits, I mean no tattoos or visible piercings (with even earrings removed), no surgery scars, etc.

It sounds like, "The Stepford wives do Birmingham"

I take Mr Golustruda,s point, he could have phrased it slighly
better.
Perhaps he should have posted it on the "British Girls without surgery scars adult database forum". and there,s nowt PC about me apart from the one I,m typing on.

I think this could also be callled cumswapping.

I must say I was quite shocked and appalled that Lizard (his tea must be laced) of all people should suggest that golostruda?s innocent post suggesting producers have a stab at making movies featuring 'natural' girls for the silent majority of disenfranchised porno buyers should be removed, presumably because he doesn?t agree with it or because some porno girls "might be offended!" I can't get my breath! - Who gives a fuck whether they would be offended or not! That's the problem with the world today, people aren?t saying what they really think or feel, they are, thorough lack of awareness and backbone, letting politically correct ponces dictate their views and opinions to them.

Although I am in total agreement with golostruda (he is indeed a wise man) I would certainly defend anyone?s right to take an opposite view and give them a fair hearing. I would certainly not demand that their thoughts and opinions be expunged like some crazy Stalinist Commissar.

Footnote: Spoke to one of the guys at ?Primetime? the other day. They are one of the biggest distributors of R18 vids and DVD?s. After a while we got him to admit that things were ?quiet? and like a lot of other industry colleagues he duly clutched at the neatest straw and suggested that it might be because porno punters didn?t (after all this time) understand that you could buy proper shag videos from your local porn emporium. What a load of bollocks! One look at the state of their recent DVD and videos covers tells me why punters are not keen to buy their merchandise. The main reason is that virtually all Primetime?s current tittles are recent American releases where all the stars look like refugees from a ?Mad Max? movie. This is what golostruda was, in a roundabout way, complaining of earlier. American producers cannot seem to grapple with the outlandish concept that all normal guys want is to a nice normal girl in a simple fuck and suck scene. Instead they seem to have got the idea into their heads that what normal guys have been praying for over the past 30 years is ?Bukkake Bollocks, Tattooed Tarts With Gaping Cunts and Assholes - and for afters ? Cr?me - fucking - pies! WRONG!

Another reason for Primetime?s slow sales is their appalling piss taking video covers. Instead of using the original artwork produced by some of the finest digital artists in the world and supplied by the studios, they (very incompetently) capture stills from the actual movie, featuring ?Bukkake Bollocks, Gaping Cunts and Assholes, etc and spread these all over the cover. This is because they think that you, the British punter, are to dim-witted to realize that it is a proper shag video unless these distasteful images are featured on the front cover. Unfortunately, by doing this they are simply alienating many porn buyers, who I?m sure everyone can agree, are just normal guys.

Officer Dibble, as you would expect - back with an interesting, acidic and relevant post.

So, no Advocaat involved, then?
Good.

Nice to see the good officer back on duty, when was the last time you saw a video box cover showing scar tissue,stretch marks
surgery scars,ugly caesarian or appendix scars. and would you purchase it if you did?.
I,m just saying what I really think and feel, your views on tatoos and piercings are already well known, I have no feelings
either way, I just enjoy watching the shagging,not the fashion show.

Lizard: (Not a strech mark in sight)