Re: Rachel Reeves
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:10 pm
I would and also would have no problem in resting my knob between Gloria De Piero's magnificent scones. And worse I always had an odd fancy for Jackie Smith....
Page 1 of 1
Re: Rachel Reeves
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 8:13 pm
A very attractive lady with lovely hair. Take note female porn stars,this is how a class lady should look.
Re: Rachel Reeves
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 9:23 am
Attractive until she opens her mouth and drones on in that boring snoring voice of hers.
One I rather fancy is Caroline Flint who supposedly had a "natural look" at uni, an image I can't get out of my mind... Luciana Berger is not bad either nor is Priti Patel.
One I rather fancy is Caroline Flint who supposedly had a "natural look" at uni, an image I can't get out of my mind... Luciana Berger is not bad either nor is Priti Patel.
Re: Rachel Reeves
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 11:38 am
Essex Lad wrote:
> Attractive until she opens her mouth and drones on in that
> boring snoring voice of hers.
>
> One I rather fancy is Caroline Flint who supposedly had a
> "natural look" at uni, an image I can't get out of my mind...
> Luciana Berger is not bad either nor is Priti Patel.
Mensch was a bit of alright for an old bird, rock chic too.
> Attractive until she opens her mouth and drones on in that
> boring snoring voice of hers.
>
> One I rather fancy is Caroline Flint who supposedly had a
> "natural look" at uni, an image I can't get out of my mind...
> Luciana Berger is not bad either nor is Priti Patel.
Mensch was a bit of alright for an old bird, rock chic too.
Re: Rachel Reeves
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 8:12 pm
Old bird? She's 42! Younger than Cathy Barry, Wendy Taylor...
Re: Rachel Reeves
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:37 am
Essex Lad wrote:
> Old bird? She's 42! Younger than Cathy Barry, Wendy Taylor...
Over 23 = old bird!
> Old bird? She's 42! Younger than Cathy Barry, Wendy Taylor...
Over 23 = old bird!