Page 1 of 1

A false Ana Nova

Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 10:50 am
by nemrod2100
I was on the net looking for other Ana Nova's titles or videos. When I see this another Ana Nova. I think it is not a good idea for a new actress uses a pseudo beloging to another actress. I cannot say the number of times when I wasted money thinking it was the true actress but in fact it was not. I think it is a very nightmare for us the fans, at first we don't envie to spend money for nothing, or waste money. Nightmare for the vendors who sell the film, and the fan who try to make a bio for his favourite pornstar. I have nothing against this actress Ana Nova however I think she has enough talent to find her own pseudo. I don't know whether the true Ana Nova or Tara Young will be glad. I don't know what do you think, but In point of view it is not a good idea to have the same pseudo for two pornstars. This is the case for mainstream movies, this is the case for music, when you decide to buy Madona's music, you don't expect another artist than Louise Veronika Ciccionne, or when you go to the cinema seeing Demi Moore, you want to see the true Demi Moore. Porn this is the same, the movies are not free, they are expensives, when you spend 30 ?, you don't want to wast it. Each year the porn industry produce 10 milliards $ at least only in USA. Nothing is free in this earth, I think this actress can at least to choose another pseudo.


Re: A false Ana Nova

Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 8:37 pm
by Len801
It occasionally happens with performes with two names (Crystal Dawn, Tracy Adams, etc) and obviously thousands of times with performers with one name.
Worst still is when they (more so for the Euro female performers) use dozens of names throghout their brief/long career.
IAFD, EGAFD, EBI must go nuts, let alone their fans, trying to figure out who is who and where they appeared in.
For fans and database compilers this must the most vexing aspect of movie identification.
Who is going to tell a porn actress not to use "Victoria" because X other performers have used it in the last 35 years? I think for the most part they really don't care what name appears on the video box cover or movie credits. They report to a movie set, shoot the scene, collect their pay and good buy. Half the time (or wuite often) they have no clue what movies they have appeared in, since at the time of the shoot no definitive title was given to them, and they don't have the time of the incliantion to keep records other than perhaps for tax purposes (and for them it was just a sex scene in a film they shot in February, April or August).
Unfornatunately very few porn performers use their real names, and so for the most part in order to hide their real identity they take on names that are similar or identical to other performers.