Page 1 of 2
Atelier bizarr
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 9:07 pm
by candela
Re: XNK1918...
Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 10:56 am
by jj
.... I have recently become convinced that 1918 and
2349
are one and the same.
Should I seek psychiatric help?
Re: XNK1918...
Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 12:53 pm
by jj
.... in support of my fevered hallucination, both girls have
a prominent mole level with and to the right of the top of
the pubic bush.
Re: XNK1918...
Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:38 pm
by candela
how about some extra screenshots, from the current ones on EGAFD i would say they are not the same
Re: Atelier bizarr
Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 3:26 pm
by jj
2349's current pics ARE misleading, especially in terms of the bobbed
hairdo she has in both titles, and her 'bath-bun' tits.
My copy of 'AB' isn't great but I'll see what I can do.
Re: 1918/2349
Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:36 am
by jj
Re: 1918/2349
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 6:09 pm
by candela
Judging from these screencaps I would say they are the same girl
Re: 1918/2349
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 6:50 pm
by jj
To be honest, I thought you would remain unconvinced- as you can
see, what material I have of 1918 is of very poor quality; and- as
you know- it's impossible to convey a general conviction, gleaned
from watching entire scenes, in either words or a few grainy caps.
I'll keep on trying to source some better caps.
Re: 1918/2349
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 6:53 pm
by jj
It's also suggestive that there seems to be a strong Karnat/Eckner
connection in 1918/2349's film appearances.
Re: 1918/2349
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 8:35 pm
by candela
If we would have to rely only on the face I would say no but the boobs and mole are identical so...