Page 1 of 1

XNK6285

Posted: Sat May 18, 2013 5:08 pm
by Dx.One

Re: XNK6285

Posted: Sun May 19, 2013 2:31 am
by jj
It's certainly plausible..... what we really need to decide it is some common
physical marker [mole or similar]......


Re: XNK6285

Posted: Sun May 19, 2013 8:45 am
by Dx.One
Yes, and they are not easy to detect here. XNK0655 doesn't take of her clothes during her scene. For one moment a part of her upper chest is visible on which she has some moles. There are three in a row. A smaller one on the upper left side and then two slightly bigger ones. The screenshots are from different angles but I think these moles are identical.

[IMG]http://img202.imagevenue.com/loc504/th_62381_snapshot20130518205346_123_504lo.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://img152.imagevenue.com/loc406/th_62381_snapshot20130518210803_123_406lo.jpg[/IMG]


XNK0655 also has a mole above the right eyebrow. For XNK6285 something is visible on the same position. It could be a mole with a little bit more makeup above it.

[IMG]http://img197.imagevenue.com/loc170/th_63036_snapshot20130518205629_123_170lo.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://img214.imagevenue.com/loc1147/th_63037_snapshot20130518210747_123_1147lo.jpg[/IMG]


Re: XNK6285

Posted: Sun May 19, 2013 8:48 am
by Dx.One
If it is the same person, maybe she is credited as "Caterine Petite" / "Catherine le Broye".

Re: XNK6285

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2016 8:19 pm
by Dx.One
At the beginning of the dream sequence with XNK6285 and Charlotte St?phie in Feuchte Tr?ume,
the narrator sais: "...wo seid ihr meine S?ssen, Stephanie, Caterine..."

That's no proof, but it could underline my suspicion that XNK6285 is Caterine/Catherine
since "Stephanie Fist" even without the help of a narrator, certainly belongs to Charlotte Stephie.

Re: XNK6285

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2016 9:14 pm
by jj
Dx One wrote:
> That's no proof, but it could underline my suspicion that
> XNK6285 is Caterine/Catherine
> since "Stephanie Fist" even without the help of a narrator,
> certainly belongs to Charlotte Stephie.

It's certainly plausible - I had the same thought re CS on the side-by-side
run-through that led to the merge. When I've worked out exactly how to frame
them, I'll add some notes.
Also, thanks for reminding me that this is not a new suggestion.... tho' in
my defence the notion only resurfaced whilst I was on another errand. Like
you I struggled to find some definitive commonalities - the moles (e.g. inner-
right thigh; back of left wrist) can't be seen across all three known titles,
alas. I think the best constants are: the teeth, especially that slightly crooked
upper-left row; the thick eyebrows; and the slighty sunken eyes - which I've
tried to emphasize in some added caps... she also has notably small breasts
with quite large areolae; and that broad/bladelike nose is distinctive too.


Re: XNK6285

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:28 pm
by jj
jj wrote:

> ... When I've worked out exactly how to frame them, I'll add some notes.
Done.