egafd.com

Or perfmormers would do too.

'Inchiesta a luci rosse'.
I'll let you work out the perfs.- wouldn't want to hog ALL the fun : -)

Aside from 2 remarkable females in the cast (Bella, Anderson) the remaining
female/and entire male cast can hardly be called "perfs".
How much do the producers charge those males to be in those scenes?

I have no clue what Kimberley has on her lips.

Len801 wrote:

> Aside from 2 remarkable females in the cast (Bella, Anderson)
> the remaining female/and entire male cast can hardly be called "perfs".
Sorry, "perfs" is admin-speak for "those bloody women who float around the
periphery of porno-shoots, getting in the way when I'm trying to make decent
caps of girls who are actually doing it, and after all that I still have to
cap these monumental wastes-of-time and make db-entries, even though it's
a BLOODY TOTAL WASTE OF MY TIME".


> I have no clue what Kimberley has on her lips.
Looks like industrial-strength Germolene.
Or possibly spermaceti : -)

But it's not that good looking girls/women in porn, or even average
looking males, are hard to find in porn (there are plenty), and even euro porn for that matter.
But why do producers waste their time (and yes.... our time and hard-earned
money) by casting such individuals?
I don't know whether you have read hc movie reviews in magazines or
on-line. Did you ever notice how politically correct they are?
Is it because those reviewers get free screeners, are part of or on the fringe of the porn
industry and are afraid to offend producers/distributors/performers, or really do
not wish to offend anyone in porn wishing to avoid controversy and from personal attacks?
They will perhaps criticize a particular "performance", but will rarely say what they really
think about a male actor or actress (or director).
How many times have you read a (recent) review of a R. Jeremy movie and will
still deferentially refer to him as a "porn legend"? Can we really get beyond the "legend"
part and call a spade a spade?

It's that old 'mates' thing- why else do we have Miro da Nola?

As to reviews- the minute a reviewer accepts that first freebie studio disc,
he's fatally compromised by conflict of interest. Even those that buy/rent
their own often get to know porn 'faces' at conventions and become infected
with bias that way.

thanks a bunch, man.

For what?
The ID, or the constant moaning : -)