egafd.com

Anais HILLS


to add:

=Ma m?re a des gros seins
(ca2010,JTC)
dir: Fabien Lafait
with: Sabrina Sweet, Marjorie (probably Marjorie [2])
(unable to find a box cover or other info)


=TAXI PERVERS
(Telsev)
male on box cover seems to be Sebastian Barrio

[img]http://www.telsev.com/media/catalog/pro ... e_face.jpg[/img][img]http://www.telsev.com/media/catalog/pro ... te_dos.jpg[/img]


=LES CASTINGS DE LHERMITE 47
(Telsev)
dir: P Lhermite
it also stars:
=the red-head Pandora, seen in LA BACHELIERE 37
(see my post about Arella )
=Cassandra Delamour:
=a black actress named Candy Kent
[img]http://www.telsev.com/media/aitmanufacturers/211.jpg[/img]
This picture seems to have been taken during the production of
LA BACHELIERE 35
see here:

[img]http://www.telsev.com/media/catalog/pro ... e_face.jpg[/img][img]http://www.telsev.com/media/catalog/pro ... te_dos.jpg[/img]


=LA FRANCE ET SES FEMMES RONDES 1
(Telsev)

[img]http://www.telsev.com/media/catalog/pro ... e_face.jpg[/img][img]http://www.telsev.com/media/catalog/pro ... te_dos.jpg[/img]

Thanks.
I haven't added the first or last titles as I can't find out anything more
about them.
[I don't mind adding 'one-horse' titles for 'historical' material but am loth
to do so for newer material- I'll keep an eye out for them, though....]

I have no problem with rejection of first title, but why would you reject the last one
(LA FRANCE ET SES FEMMES RONDES 1).
You don't believe the chunky girl in stockings and blue costume (seen in two
small thumbnails on the back DVD cover) is Anais?

Len801 wrote:
> I have no problem with rejection of first title, but why would
> you reject the last one (LA FRANCE ET SES FEMMES RONDES)

1) No cast-info available.
2) No idea who any of the cast are [with the one exception).
3) Haven't seen it, not likely to.



> You don't believe the chunky girl ..... is Anais?
It probably is.
But- as for many of the others in this thread....
I have to get a look at the film itself, or at least some GQ screens;
I have to do a time-consuming web-search to try and identify as many of
the cast as possible [who are usually complete strangers to me];
Make entries and caps for any new perfs. and for the existing ones;
Cross-refer for other titles the cast has done....
.... which in turn generates a slew of 'secondary' new perfs. for whom the
entire process has to be repeated.
In between all this I have to eat- usually while answering other forum-
queries, etc.- and do paperwork that I didn't have time to do while I was
at work.

The average for ONE new title is that I need to find, identify, watch, cap,
and make notes for 20 other titles to render the entry remotely complete.
That's a whole evening- if all goes well. For what was ONE film in the first
place. I'm not complaining [well, not much], but I wanted to explain that
IMO any cost-benefit analysis based on the value of my time strongly favours
my leaving 'one-horse' flicks for a later date.... which I freely admit, may
never come. I'm not, alas [or perhaps mercifully, for everyones' sake],
immortal : -)
I could just say 'fuck it' and make a load of film-entries with just the one
[unillustrated] perf.- but that's not my style. I'd rather have ten decently-
complete entries than 100 half-assed ones, any day.

Len801 wrote:

> =a black actress named Candy Kent
> [img]http://www.telsev.com/media/aitmanufacturers/211.jpg[/img]
> This picture seems to have been taken during the production of
> LA BACHELIERE 35
> see here:

As is often the case with Telsev, they can't spel. Candy Kent is in fact Candy Kunt.

Changed.

If you're wondering why I seemed to stop work on the Telsev stuff midstream-
blame them. I had been dowloading some 'supporting material' when I started
getting loads of d/l problems. Despite repeated emails I didn't even get the
courtesy of a single reply. Not even a simple 'fuck off, we don't care'
I'm happy for them that they're apparently making so much money they can
afford to piss-off a regular customer. Sorry, EX-customer......

I do not weep for them, and pro-am stuff from any country has never
interested me in the least. Do with the information I passed on as you wish.
I have moved on to other stuff, and if that's the way they behave, there is no need
to extend any additional courtesy to them.

Len801 wrote:
> I have moved on to other stuff, and if that's the way they
> behave, there is no need to extend any additional courtesy to them.

That's pretty much my view as well.

jj wrote:

> Changed.

I am not at home and don't have access to the admin site (or I would have done this myself), but perhaps I wasn't dear before.

There are now 2 listings for Candy Kunt while there should only be one.

Here is the original listing for Candy Kunt.

And her is the old listing of Candy Kent now properly named Candy Kunt.

It's obviously the same girl.

Of course, my original check would have been for Kent.
Thanks, will merge them.