Page 1 of 1

Senza ritegno (2004?)

Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 9:38 am
by wmjkr78
A different title from the one with the same name already present on the site.

First scene with Sexy Luna, second scene with Erika Neri, third scene with Jessica Fiorentino, fourth scene with Federica Tommasi and Sexy Luna.

Already on IAFD: http://www.iafd.com/title.rme/title=Bab ... mits_2.htm
Apparently called also as "Shameless Beauties": http://www.buyeuroporn.com/shop/senza-r ... -1323.html

Re: Senza ritegno (2004?)

Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 1:04 pm
by Len801
It seems you are referring to the wrong movie (having same name).
This is the right one:

and the US English version was released as BABES WITH NO LIMITS #2

[img]http://www.superzeta.it/gallery/image.php?pic_id=10410[/img]

The Andrea Nobili version with Sexy Luna was to my knowledge never released as
SHAMELESS BEAUTIES.

Re: Senza ritegno (2004?)

Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 3:33 pm
by jj
Len801 wrote:
> The Andrea Nobili version with Sexy Luna was to my knowledge
> never released as SHAMELESS BEAUTIES.

I couldn't spot that alternate either. 'Shameless' is the title for the DVD
release of the earlier [c. 1995] 'SR'.


Re: Senza ritegno (2004?)

Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 3:35 pm
by jj
BTW, the 'Babes with No Limits' release seems to have a scene with Nikky
Parker added on.


Re: Senza ritegno (2004?)

Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 3:46 pm
by Len801
wmjkr78 has the two titles all mixed up.
If we really want to get fussy about Nobili's SENZA RITEGNO (the Pink'o version)
as can be seen from the DVD box cover, you will note the emblazoned title
at the top of the cover "Girl's Obsexion". That was an attempt to market the movie
overseas, and particularly in North America (although Pleasure ended up retitling and
repackaging it with different artwork).
At that time Pink'o was making strong attempts to somewhat globalize its titles
and slapping on English titles on the box covers, as well as even trying to have
its performers speak English (in a very lame phonetic way).

Re: Senza ritegno (2004?)

Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 4:04 am
by jj
That Girls Obsexion thing appears on several titles and is equally annoying on
all of them : -) As a lifelong pedant it's the intentional but unwitty solecism
that irks me. People who think it's 'funky' to drop 'sex' into any word they
choose [sextastic, sextuality, etc., shudder] have long ago departed the shores
of good taste.

I find the Germans are the worst for littering their artwork with disconnected
phrases. Sometimes several minutes' thought is necessary to decipher what the
title is actually supposed to be. And even then I'm not always entirely sure : -)