egafd.com

Hi, babies. Please I need to find title of this (whole) movie and especially name of "mistress". Thanx vr mch.

Babies?
My fondest wish would be if the original and all copies of such garbage
would be put in a bonfire. This is definitely not porn!

Len801 wrote:
> Babies?
Not everyone has your command of English. Approaching senility as I am, I
find being addressed of as a baby somewhat comforting : -)


> My fondest wish would be if the original and all copies of such
> garbage > would be put in a bonfire. This is definitely not porn!
The notion of putting ANY form of expression into a fire should give libertarians
everywhere the shudders 0 -)
Not to everyone's taste, no; and borderline in terms of content. But there's
no harm in his enquiring.

I found it...is it movie Spanking Special 1.

I don't know in what well-known languages adult males would be addressed as "babies".
Enfants, gars, ragazzi, guys...all OK, but babies?

Anyway, I don't see where by any large stretch of hard core movie pornography people getting spanked, whipped
and thrashed and humiliated qualifies as hard core. I am not even sure EGAFD even lists suck "works".

I am not a lawyer or criminologist and frankly have no clue whether such activity (where one pays a "mistress"
to basically humiliate you and whip you) qualifies as outright prostitution, if no sex is involved (oral, penetration, etc)
in most democratic countries. I tend to believe that to a large extent where no physical contact of the genitals occurs
it would be difficult to make a case for prostitution (there may be a case for tax
evasion or health considerations, but otherwise it may be hard to prosecute under current prostitution laws).

Len801 wrote:
> Enfants, gars, ragazzi, guys...all OK, but babies?
I guess you could loosely translate 'enfants' as babies. Without knowledge
of the OP's native tongue speculation is bootless. His intent was clearly to
come across as friendly, and for me that's all that matters.


> ... I am not even sure EGAFD even lists suck "works".
Bgafd certainly does. And we list the Street- and Panty-Pisser series, for
example - which is basically just girls peeing. It's egADULTfd, not egHARDCOREfd : -)
I guess at a pinch you could interpret that remit to include X-rated mainstream
films, if your inclination ran that way.



> I am not a lawyer or criminologist and frankly have no clue
> whether such activity (where one pays a "mistress"
> to basically humiliate you and whip you) qualifies as outright
> prostitution, if no sex is involved
That's a whole other topic. 'Sex' is involved in that the customer gets some
form of sexual release, be it physical, psychological and/or biochemical. I'm
happy to leave it to the law to determine whether - say - paying a woman to
crush beetles with her feet for one's "satisfaction" would qualify as sexual -
and whether that service then qualifies as prostitution.
That said, criminalizing prostitution strikes me as immature and makes about as
much sense as outlawing drug-abuse. Both are also ruinously expensive and utterly
doomed to failure.