egafd.com

PATERNITA'
(2011,PigItalia)
79 min
director: Andrea Brancati=Andy Casanova


3 unconnected incest-themed scenes

(1) "Paternita'" (translation: Paternity): father-daughter
Monica Desideri, Omar Montoya [anal, open mouth facial]
With wife either gone or dead, Montoya has grown closer to his young
daughter to the extent they have had a sexual encounter. She phones him
and she is not certain that she wants to continue seeing him, even though he says
he misses her dearly.
The sex scene shown in flashback is their consensual sexual encounter in the bedroom.
At then end of the phone conversation, he paces his room nervously, and
there is a tap on the window and she enters the room, having finally
accepted she wants to be with him as well.

(2) "Riunione di Famiglia" {translation: Family Reunion): mother-son
Sexi Moni=Monica Boldi, Villa Lo Bos [facial]
Monica returns home to find her son there, who tells her he has been
fired from the insurance company. She tries to cheer him up, she gives
him a massage and things progress quickly to sex.

(3) "Sorella Crudele" (translation: Cruel Sister): sister-brother
Giulia Mei (in role of Monica), Dark Angel [facial]
Angel tells his sister than he has marital problems. She tries to
comfort him up first by giving him a hand job, then bj and vaginal sex.

Thanks.

If I may ask a question regarding the information trasnferred to the movie page for
this title.
Why in two of the scene breakdowns is there an indication: b.g
If it means boy/girl, why is it necessary to make such a distinction? Is it that
difficult to discern there is a male and female in the scene from the brief description
of the action and participants (1m/1f) involved?

Len801 wrote:
> .... why is it necessary to make such a distinction?

Necessary? Possibly not. Desirable? Certainly.
It does no harm to be explicit that "M1, F2" is M1 screwing F2 rather than,
say, F2 giving him a BJ or them both having a quiet game of tiddlywinks over
a nice glass of Chablis. Also, see my previous re iafd's lack of explicitness
[OK, selective lack] in this regard....
I'm used to getting clobbered for leaving info out. Getting truncheoned for
putting too much in makes a pleasant change : -)

Where is the truncheon?
If I am describing a sex scene between a male and female (the only ones in the scene)
am I to indicate blow job, vaginal sex, all the sex positions? That is a given, unless
really nothing is going on, in which case I would be expected to mention it.
I used to get very upset at CAVR movie reviews when there were more at least 2 or more
females in the scene and Den would indicate "anal" or "facial". Who did anal, and who
took a facial? Frustrating.
But indicating b/g in a scene you know only features one male and one female? Really
overkill in my view.

Len801 wrote:
> Where is the truncheon?
Next time I'll put a smiley and 'JOKE' in Dayglo capitals......

Bitter experience has taught us to assume a passing egafd-user has an IQ
slightly smaller than his shoe-size. It's insulting to the majority but it's
the idiot minority we have to head off at the pass.