Page 1 of 1
XNK7059
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2015 12:09 pm
by Texxx
Re: XNK7059
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 1:07 am
by Texxx
One film in her filmography is Troia Ridens (not Troia Riders).
Re: XNK7059
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 2:23 am
by Len801
Don't know how it ended up being TROIA RIDERS (actually that would be a funny
title: WHORE RIDERS), as I had properly spelled it in my review I posted
on Sept 16/2015:
Thanks for ID'ing her from that movie.
I suppose the porn title is a sort of spoof on the mainstream title FEMINA RIDENS (THE LAUGHING WOMAN)
(1969) featuring Dagmar Lassander
Re: XNK7059
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 12:45 pm
by jj
Amended, thanks both.
My error, I misread n for the similar r. As an Anglophone I might also have
subconsciously preferred 'riders' with its sexual connotations over 'ridens'
in that rather elliptical bilingual pun. If it had been , say, 'meretrix
ridens' then there would have been no ambiguity : -)
Re: XNK7059
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 1:24 pm
by Len801
Question. When an unknown X performer has been identified,
is the procedure to go back to the notes involving the movie title to
also amend the name of the performer.
As it stands the notes to the movie read as follows
4.XNK7059. Masturbates on a bed.
and no name of that performer has been added to the cast names
Re: XNK7059
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 1:47 pm
by jj
Len801 wrote:
> Question. When an unknown X performer has been identified,
Answer. In general yes, if one remembers. In the past this doesn't always
seem to have been done, but where I notice inconsistencies in a review I
amend them. Again, it's probably a workload issue more than anything else -
and readers can usually decipher from the unaltered text who is now who.