Page 1 of 1
Olga [17] vs. XNK 5329
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:38 am
by Johray1
I researched "Young Czechs Amators 3" to have more "material",
but I never got further than "Amators 2"
"Lolitas slaves 5" brought me... nowhere...
It is just a vague similarity... Seems like I caught the "Olga-Complex" for I
could not let go posting it... !flush!
!surrender!
Re: Olga [17] vs. XNK 5329
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 6:27 am
by jj
Johray1 wrote:
> It is just a vague similarity...
Yes. It is : -)
Sandra Kay and a Hobbit have a closer resemblance than your pair.
Re: Olga [17] vs. XNK 5329
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 7:09 am
by Johray1
> Yeah, it is a complex!
But hey: What do you think about this?
XNK6959 = ROSSES!
-----------------
I veryfied myself and included one pic from an un-listed "Rosses"-Film
(Hart im Arsch, Videorama)
[IMG]http://img296.imagevenue.com/loc401/th_40501_Rossesmu_123_401lo.jpg[/IMG]
What do you think?! To me it is.... NOT a complex !wink!
Re: Olga [17] vs. XNK 5329
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:36 pm
by marcel_43
Johray1 wrote:
> What do you think about this?
>
>
> XNK6959 = ROSSES!
>
>
>
Not the same person.
Rosses was born in 1986. The title of
XNK6959 is from 1999.
Re: Olga [17] vs. XNK 5329
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 6:07 pm
by Johray1
>JJ
Not the same person. Rosses was born in 1986. The title of XNK6959 is from 1999.
----------------------------------------------------------------
I do not doubt that your research brought in the exact resultl: 1999.
As a matter of fact... it is impossible for a girl from 1986 to be part of this film.
That is that. Fin?!
It could be possible though that 1986 is not exactly the right date of birth... !annoyed!
But, as that is only speculation... and as it is NOT my intention
to bad-mouth a very beloved actress; like she is ... -at least to me-
We will take it as it as for sure...
IMPOSSIBLE!!
Nevertheless:
Thanks for your efforts and taking the time! !blush!