Page 1 of 2

Film: "Sündig und eng" GER/2002

Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2016 2:59 pm
by Johray1
Title: "S?ndig und eng"

Image

Country: Germany
Original-audio
Label: Profima
Director: None credited
Actresses/Actors: None credited
Run-Time: 82 min.
Cat. Nr.: ZA 505
Year: 2002

Info: ==>


Girls-cast and scenes:
---------------------

Image



SCENE 1:
Peggy [8] vs. Unknown Male 1 (Unknown Male 2 passive; non-sex)

BJ, Pussy-licking, Pussy-Fucking, Facial

SCENE 2:
Vivian [8] vs. Unknown Male 2 & Unknown Male 3

BJs, Pussy-licking, Pussy-Fucking, Peeing, Cum-shot on pussy, Internal cum-shot

SCENE 3:
Unknown Female vs. Unknown Male 2
Masturbation, Pussy-Fingering, Pussy-Fucking, Internal cum-shot

SCENE 4:
Petty vs. Unknown Male 2

Pussy-Fingering, Pussy-Fucking, Facial




Scene 1:
ImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImage





Scene 2:
ImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImage





Scene 3:
ImageImageImage
ImageImageImage





Scene 4:
ImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImage









Unknown Males 1-3 (left to right):
ImageImageImage

(Of course no "unknowns" for real; UM 1 is seen in some scenes with
Peggy [8] and UM 2 and UM 3 are all over the place in "BEX/Profima/Ipanema
and Projekt 54- films... Still: No IDs known...)

All pics taken from: "S?ndig und eng" GER/2002


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------












In terms of "adult-film" action "S?ndig und eng" is... dreadful...
But still Peggy and Vivian turn "their" scenes into something very attractive.

Scenes 1 and 2 contain about 50% "talkative" content and these
"dialogue" scenes are the real deal here.

Very loose, improvised-feel to the "story-lines"...
No over-acting, no camera-shyness, no silly mimicries of whoever,
no embarrassed silence or giggling... etc...

Not exactly what an "adult-film" should be about; but as the adult-parts
are failures here anyway, it comes across like a pleasant surprise
to have this going on... !happy!

Scenes 3 and 4 are shamefully dull and very unattractive viewing; but I don't see
it to be the girls' fault...

Unknown Male 2 places a not too decent camera in distant-"total position",
throws his heavy body onto the girls who, as no surprise at all,
become almost invisible, then...

At times, close before suffocation I suppose, you see their heads appear;
starving for some air and...
EVERYONE is happy when the "scenes" are finally over...

In case it (still) sounds interesting:
This film is long out of print, but at least "Scene 1"
is featured on "Dummgeile G?renfotzen" (2013!) by DBM:

==>

Re: Film: "S?ndig und eng" GER/2002

Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 10:01 pm
by jj
Re Petty, I still have doubts. She seems to be firmly embedded at 1996/7
(ignoring a couple of 'aberrant' later titles on iafd).
I'm going to play it safe for now, and list her with a query.


Re: Film: "S?ndig und eng" GER/2002

Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 10:15 pm
by jj
jj wrote:
> I'm going to play it safe for now, and list her with a query.
I went for a note instead. Rule 33: minds can be changed.

The unknown, from certain angles, looks remarkably like Ursula [4]. No tat
that I can see, though.


Re: Film: "S?ndig und eng" GER/2002

Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 10:17 pm
by Johray1
jj wrote:

> Re Petty, I still have doubts. She seems to be firmly embedded
> at 1996/7
> (ignoring a couple of 'aberrant' later titles on iafd).
> I'm going to play it safe for now, and list her with a query.
----------------------------------------------
Alright: Playing safe is always the best option if unaware about any ID.
!happy!

My caps of this girl here are rather s***e, but the best I could get... !sad!
As you know "Petty" better than me...

Do you think "Hearing" and "Seeing" a short sequence of her could help
regarding ID?!?!?


Re: Film: "S?ndig und eng" GER/2002

Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 10:33 pm
by Johray1
jj wrote:

> jj wrote:
> > I'm going to play it safe for now, and list her with a query.
> I went for a note instead. Rule 33: minds can be changed.
>
> The unknown, from certain angles, looks remarkably like Ursula
> [4]. No tat > that I can see, though.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, there is some similarity etween them...
Besides that, as you can't know, the Unknown Blonde here speaks
with "east-european accent" (Probably "polish") and Ursula
is defintetly a "Berlin Girl"...

I hate it bringing on these obscure girls all the while...
Wish they were not part of these films I like to review for
the "Vivian [8]s" of this world; for example.... !hmmm!


Re: Film: "S?ndig und eng" GER/2002

Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 10:37 pm
by jj
Johray1 wrote:
> Yes, there is some similarity etween them...
> the Unknown Blonde here speaks with "east-european accent" and Ursula
> is defintetly a "Berlin Girl"...
Good enough. Woth mentioning, though.


> I hate it bringing on these obscure girls all the while...
Past experience is that (for the modern age at least) gettng pics of these
XNKs up pretty often then gets them identified and/or a bunch of other
titles found.
Example, more/less at random: Olga [17].


Re: Film: "S?ndig und eng" GER/2002

Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 10:43 pm
by Johray1
jj wrote:

> Past experience is that (for the modern age at least) gettng
> pics of these
> XNKs up pretty often then gets them identified and/or a bunch
> of other
> titles found.
> Example, more/less at random:
> Olga
> [17]
.
-----------------------------------------
That's a good point and a certain relief; in this case I can at least say that
the "Unknown Blonde" shot some scenes...
and is therefore not a "hopeless" One-off.


Re: Film: "S?ndig und eng" GER/2002

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 10:52 am
by draker
Unknown Male 2 = Thomas Fritz

Re: Film: "S?ndig und eng" GER/2002

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 3:07 pm
by deezer
draker wrote:
>>Unknown Male 2 = Thomas Fritz

Definitly not. He should be the same athletic adonis as from this random clip with Lyvia.
He is one of the standard males from Bex-Television.
As I know, he is not listed at iafd.

Re: Film: "S?ndig und eng" GER/2002

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 10:08 pm
by Johray1
deezer wrote:

> draker wrote:
> >>Unknown Male 2 = Thomas Fritz
>
> Definitly not. He should be the same athletic adonis
> as
> from this random clip
with
> Lyvia.
> He is one of the standard males from Bex-Television.
> As I know, he is not listed at iafd.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Like Deezer says:
This is NOT THOMAS FRITZ!!

IN/ON "BEX"-productions he is often credited as "Jo Brown"... Being actor/director/camera-man in one person.

(Credits: left below)
[IMG]http://thumbnails107.imagebam.com/40531/c08bd5405309349.jpg[/IMG]


Iafd only knows him as "director" but the profile holds no pic: