Page 1 of 2
The obviously "lost" review?!
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 2:26 pm
by Johray1
Just in case this one possibly has been "buried" in-between
the many posts surrounding it...
Don't hope it to be simply "inappropriate"... !doh!
Re: The obviously "lost" review?!
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 2:31 pm
by jj
My restraining-order prohibits me from being within 500m of any Girl
Guides or Young Pioneers,.
Re: The obviously "lost" review?!
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 2:54 pm
by Johray1
jj wrote:
> My restraining-order prohibits me from being within 500m of any
> Girl > Guides or Young Pioneers,.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually there aren't any... they just play them...
I don't really understand.... sorry...
Re: The obviously "lost" review?!
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 3:25 pm
by jj
Errr... I'm leaving this one to Alec : -)
Re: The obviously "lost" review?!
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 3:46 pm
by Johray1
jj wrote:
> Errr... I'm leaving this one to Alec : -)
------------------------------------------------
Thanks.
Alec is great and appears to have a huge knowledge about russian girls !happy!
Still it may cause inconveniences, I fear... !sad!
But, I think one has to start somewhere to make obscurities less obscure, right?!
Re: The obviously "lost" review?!
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:03 pm
by jj
Johray1 wrote:
> Alec is great
Yes he is.
> and appears to have a huge knowledge about russian girls
.... he does, now....
> But, I think one has to start somewhere to make obscurities
> less obscure, right?
We but see "through a glass, darkly".
Re: The obviously "lost" review?!
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:25 pm
by Johray1
jj wrote:
> Johray1 wrote:
> > Alec is great
> Yes he is.
> > and appears to have a huge knowledge about russian girls
> .... he does, now....
>
>
> > But, I think one has to start somewhere to make obscurities
> > less obscure, right?
> We but see "through a glass, darkly"
----------------------------------
I fully understand; honestly...
Seeing this film the first time... I only could tell
Sneila, Leilas and Viktorija to be in the cast.
Sonia [13] became apparent a little later...
The rest made me (2-3 still do) think "Who the f**k are they??!"
So, I am truly aware of the difficulties and will of course be supportive
as far as I can if things need clearance... whatever...etc...
!cool!
Re: The obviously "lost" review?!
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:54 pm
by deezer
jj wrote:
>>We but see "through a glass, darkly"
..."; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known."
Re: The obviously "lost" review?!
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 5:02 pm
by Johray1
deezer wrote:
> jj wrote:
> >>We but see "through a glass, darkly"
>
> ..."; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall
> I know even as also I am known."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
??? !confused!
Re: The obviously "lost" review?!
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 6:11 pm
by jj
Pair of Sunday-School rejects, that's us : 0-)