Page 1 of 2

A tiny Angel Dark issue...

Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 11:36 pm
by Johray1
Would you agree this is Angel Dark, even if her (tiny) tattoo
on left-upper arm has never been updated on the iafd?!

The pics are from 2009.




[IMG]http://img278.imagevenue.com/loc196/th_70214_AD._123_196lo.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://img268.imagevenue.com/loc96/th_70701_AD3__123_96lo.jpg[/IMG]


Re: A tiny Angel Dark issue...

Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 11:44 pm
by jj
Johray1 wrote:
> Would you agree this is Angel Dark

No.


Re: A tiny Angel Dark issue...

Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 11:55 pm
by Johray1
jj wrote:

> Johray1 wrote:
> > Would you agree this is Angel Dark
------------------------------------------------
Perfect. !happy" Couldn't have thought it hadn't been updated for ages.

Think of her to possibly be Camilla [7]



but can't find a picture of her in "Nya Lolitan p? Landet" to be sure ;(


If you should happen to have a copy... and if you should could be so nice ...

to check it out?! Sorry for being so demanding... !wink!

Re: A tiny Angel Dark issue...

Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 12:21 am
by jj
Don't seem to have access to a copy....


Re: A tiny Angel Dark issue...

Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 12:27 am
by Johray1
jj wrote:

> Don't seem to have access to a copy....
----------------------------------------------

Alright and thanks for trying!.

Re: A tiny Angel Dark issue...

Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 6:08 am
by jj
One can usually find the Tabu versions on the Interweb; not in this case,
it seems.


Re: A tiny Angel Dark issue...

Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 6:19 am
by Johray1
@jj: Thanks for your take on this issue. I was pretty sure not to see AD as well
but wanted it safe because I knew I only had
one option left to ID this girl in a film I've longed to review for quite some
time now.
= Researching her "in full" would mean diving into muddy waters. I knew!!!
And muddy it was. Or is, still.
!shark!

I have a "waterproof" on-screen ID for "Kamilla Juggs" that fits no one,
not even truly "Kamilla"- But helped to find her.


To illustrate:
The re-searched girl left, the already "thrown in" on the right:

[IMG]http://img209.imagevenue.com/loc42/th_86121_sre00_123_42lo.jpg[/IMG]


But whatever; the main source that opened the box, of course, will have to be acceptable.
To me it undoubtly is, even more as it mainly gives hints to very solid info:
Original DVD-releases, displaying her name on covers and sometimes her pic as well...

But, it's not me to decide.

Here you go and thanks for your attention:



Cap:

[IMG]http://img163.imagevenue.com/loc60/th_87422_res.999_123_60lo.jpg[/IMG]

=> Link:



Found two more films featuring her... plus 2 others I can deliver iron-cast proof for...
Makes a surprisingly "huge" filmo for a girl yet virtually unknown.

[IMG]http://img134.imagevenue.com/loc364/th_87553_sre9999_123_364lo.jpg[/IMG]


PS: These K/Camillas are the toughest babes in the ring I've known so far...


Re: A tiny Angel Dark issue...

Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 6:42 am
by jj
I'm happy those pics are of Camilla/Kamilla, but are they sourced?
Or do we have any others that are?


Re: A tiny Angel Dark issue...

Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 6:51 am
by jj
... the side-by-side pics, especially the LH one, remind me very much
of Veronica da Souza.


Re: A tiny Angel Dark issue...

Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 7:40 am
by Johray1
jj wrote:

> I'm happy those pics are of Camilla/Kamilla, but are they
> sourced?
> Or do we have any others that are?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

There are no directly linked IDs/Caps in the film I'm working on-
But, if you connect girls already listed (and she is the only one who
isn't on any of the well known sites) it's pretty reasonable that
"Kamilla Juggs" must be her.
We will see if that is convincing or if she will have to remain "Unknown"


As one can hardly tell by a headshot; Veronica she is not.



The girl here is more "petite" and Slim.
But, we will see!

Thanks.