egafd.com

the girl at 10:08:30
with tatto on her back


https://xhamster.com/movies/2454730/dbm ... wdown.html


thx

nope, i meant the girl after that
at 70 min

Before posting a query, peeps should reasonably expect the enquirer to
have done a basic amount of 'due diligence' research... the film's
title is in the URL; there are both bgafd and egafd entries for the film;
only one actress listed for the film has those tats.....

jj wrote:

> Before posting a query, peeps should reasonably expect the
> enquirer to
> have done a basic amount of 'due diligence' research... the
> film's
> title is in the URL; there are both bgafd and egafd entries for
> the film;
> only one actress listed for the film has those tats.....

And before posting an answer (performer name), peeps shouldn't
reasonably expect the responder to interpret the query correctly. !grin!

10:08:30 isn't "10 min 8 sec", but "1 h 8 min 30 sec".
That's too much for a feeble-minded lad like me. !confused!


Btw. there is no note for the tatt in bgafd and the image server seems to be down:-(

deezer wrote:
> Btw. there is no note for the tatt in bgafd and the image
> server seems to be down:-(
There aren't many such notes on bgafd; and there won't be any more added.
Images (including tats) fine this side.... and I've had my little rage-
dump now, so let's put this one to bed. Donna Warner.

deezer wrote:
> 10:08:30 isn't "10 min 8 sec", but "1 h 8 min 30 sec".
...errr.. I think most peeps would read that as '10 hours, 8 minutes,
and 30 seconds.

thx

its correct, donna warner

jj wrote:

> deezer wrote:
> > Btw. there is no note for the tatt in bgafd and the image
> > server seems to be down:-(
> There aren't many such notes on bgafd; and there won't be any
> more added.
> Images (including tats) fine this side


Yes, images working now. But first I feared, bgafd is starting with Brexit right now:-)

>Donna Warner.

Thanks, I knew:-)