Page 1 of 1

XNK8056

Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 7:02 pm
by Dx.One
XNK8056

Looks like some pics ended up in the wrong gallery.

The pics in 8056's gallery belong to XNK1846.

There is a girl in red underwear in that scene. I assume she was supposed to be XNK8056.

Re: XNK8056

Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 9:29 pm
by alec
I found it difficult to decide which was XNK1846.

I've changed 8056 to the girl in red underwear, though if you hadn't mentioned the red underwear, I wouldn't have noticed from my caps.

Is it correct now?

Re: XNK8056

Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 10:01 pm
by Dx.One
>>Is it correct now?
I think so.

BTW: somebody on VEF suggested that XNK8056 and XNK8057 are Manya and Susan Turner (Emmanuelle Kane).
But I'm not really familiar with Manya and just from the caps I can't tell if the other girl is really Susan Turner.

Re: XNK8056

Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 10:09 pm
by alec
Dx One wrote:

> >>Is it correct now?
> I think so.

Thanks.

>
> BTW: somebody on VEF suggested that XNK8056 and XNK8057 are
> Manya
> and Susan Turner
> (Emmanuelle
> Kane
).
> But I'm not really familiar with Manya and just from the caps I
> can't tell if the other girl is really Susan Turner.

I'm not greatly familiar with Manya either, but the new 8056 does look familiar.

Re: XNK8056

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 2:30 pm
by jj
Dx One wrote:
> BTW: somebody on VEF suggested that XNK8056 and XNK8057 are
> Manya
> and Susan Turner
> (Emmanuelle
> Kane
).

Those were my exact thoughts.
I'm not massively familiar with the younger Manya but it's worth adding
a note. 1846: I'd want to see the film or failing that, more caps.


Re: XNK8056

Posted: Wed May 31, 2017 11:19 am
by jj
jj wrote:
> I'm not massively familiar with the younger Manya but it's
> worth adding a note.
Side-by-sides of the distinctive moles in Manya and 8056:
[IMG]http://img164.imagevenue.com/loc38/th_09780_1_123_38lo.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://img163.imagevenue.com/loc139/th_09781_1a_123_139lo.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://img255.imagevenue.com/loc219/th_09782_2_123_219lo.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://img194.imagevenue.com/loc148/th_09784_2a_123_148lo.jpg[/IMG]
While I can't illustrate a 1-to-1 correspondence (camera-angles etc.)
having seen the film now I'm sure.


> 1846: I'd want to see the film or failing that, more caps.
Having seen it, I'm pretty sure it's EK.


Re: XNK8056

Posted: Wed May 31, 2017 11:34 pm
by Dx.One
JJ wrote:
>> 1846: I'd want to see the film or failing that, more caps.
>>Having seen it, I'm pretty sure it's EK.

Ehm... I guess you mean 8057 and not 1846.
I've seen 1846 in several movies. That's certainly not EK.

Re: XNK8056

Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2017 4:34 am
by jj
Dx One wrote:
> Ehm... I guess you mean 8057 and not 1846
Yes. Senility again : -)