Page 1 of 1
XNK8056
Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 7:02 pm
by Dx.One
XNK8056
Looks like some pics ended up in the wrong gallery.
The pics in 8056's gallery belong to
XNK1846.
There is a girl in red underwear in that scene. I assume she was supposed to be XNK8056.
Re: XNK8056
Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 9:29 pm
by alec
I found it difficult to decide which was XNK1846.
I've changed 8056 to the girl in red underwear, though if you hadn't mentioned the red underwear, I wouldn't have noticed from my caps.
Is it correct now?
Re: XNK8056
Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 10:01 pm
by Dx.One
>>Is it correct now?
I think so.
BTW: somebody on VEF suggested that XNK8056 and XNK8057 are
Manya and Susan Turner (
Emmanuelle Kane).
But I'm not really familiar with Manya and just from the caps I can't tell if the other girl is really Susan Turner.
Re: XNK8056
Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 10:09 pm
by alec
Dx One wrote:
> >>Is it correct now?
> I think so.
Thanks.
>
> BTW: somebody on VEF suggested that XNK8056 and XNK8057 are
>
Manya
> and Susan Turner
> (
Emmanuelle
> Kane).
> But I'm not really familiar with Manya and just from the caps I
> can't tell if the other girl is really Susan Turner.
I'm not greatly familiar with Manya either, but the new 8056 does look familiar.
Re: XNK8056
Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 2:30 pm
by jj
Dx One wrote:
> BTW: somebody on VEF suggested that XNK8056 and XNK8057 are
>
Manya
> and Susan Turner
> (
Emmanuelle
> Kane).
Those were my exact thoughts.
I'm not massively familiar with the younger Manya but it's worth adding
a note. 1846: I'd want to see the film or failing that, more caps.
Re: XNK8056
Posted: Wed May 31, 2017 11:19 am
by jj
jj wrote:
> I'm not massively familiar with the younger Manya but it's
> worth adding a note.
Side-by-sides of the distinctive moles in Manya and 8056:
[IMG]http://img164.imagevenue.com/loc38/th_09780_1_123_38lo.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://img163.imagevenue.com/loc139/th_09781_1a_123_139lo.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://img255.imagevenue.com/loc219/th_09782_2_123_219lo.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://img194.imagevenue.com/loc148/th_09784_2a_123_148lo.jpg[/IMG]
While I can't illustrate a 1-to-1 correspondence (camera-angles etc.)
having seen the film now I'm sure.
> 1846: I'd want to see the film or failing that, more caps.
Having seen it, I'm pretty sure it's EK.
Re: XNK8056
Posted: Wed May 31, 2017 11:34 pm
by Dx.One
JJ wrote:
>> 1846: I'd want to see the film or failing that, more caps.
>>Having seen it, I'm pretty sure it's EK.
Ehm... I guess you mean 8057 and not 1846.
I've seen 1846 in several movies. That's certainly not EK.
Re: XNK8056
Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2017 4:34 am
by jj
Dx One wrote:
> Ehm... I guess you mean 8057 and not 1846
Yes. Senility again : -)