Sabine [10] = Babsi [2]
Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2017 1:50 pm
![[IMG]http://img43.imagevenue.com/loc87/th_78116_Sab_123_87lo.jpg[/IMG]](http://img43.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=78116_Sab_123_87lo.jpg){kind=link}
Thanks.
Page 1 of 2
Re: Sabine [10] = Babsi [2]
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 5:34 am
Re: Sabine [10] = Babsi [2]
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 11:38 am
Johray1 wrote:
> Sabine [10]
>
> =
> Babsi [2]
>
>
> [IMG]http://img43.imagevenue.com/loc87/th_78116_Sab_123_87lo.jpg[/IMG]
>
Sorry for beeing late, but are you sure that they are the same?
I can't say, because I didn't see a scene of her/them.
But anyhow, before a merge, please consider, that Sabine and/or Babsi aren't
in Popp oder Hopp 20, which is listed for Sabine.
There is another unknown (at least for me) actress in the film.
I will make a short review for this film in new thread.
> Sabine [10]
>
> =
> Babsi [2]
>
>
> [IMG]http://img43.imagevenue.com/loc87/th_78116_Sab_123_87lo.jpg[/IMG]
>
Sorry for beeing late, but are you sure that they are the same?
I can't say, because I didn't see a scene of her/them.
But anyhow, before a merge, please consider, that Sabine and/or Babsi aren't
in Popp oder Hopp 20, which is listed for Sabine.
There is another unknown (at least for me) actress in the film.
I will make a short review for this film in new thread.
Re: Sabine [10] = Babsi [2]
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 5:16 pm
deezer wrote:
> Sorry for beeing late, but are you sure that they are the same?
> I can't say, because I didn't see a scene of her/them.
> But anyhow, before a merge, please consider, that Sabine and/or
> Babsi aren't
> in Popp
> oder Hopp 20, which is listed for Sabine.
> There is another unknown (at least for me) actress in the film.
> I will make a short review for this film in new thread.
------------------------------
???????????????????
No need to be sorry for being late..
But, not sorry about confusing people?!?!
I never stated Sabine is in that particular film...
Did I?
I ONLY say: Sabine = Babsi!
No more, no less!
And, as we has it all before, I don't get your point at all!
See posts from 11-24-16
Please prove where I'm wrong concerning Sabine = Babsi
and I shall speak no more!
Like I said: I never confirmed Sabine to be in that film she is listed for!
DID I??
NO!
Correct me, if I'm wrong!
Don't know what you are talking about, actually...
> Sorry for beeing late, but are you sure that they are the same?
> I can't say, because I didn't see a scene of her/them.
> But anyhow, before a merge, please consider, that Sabine and/or
> Babsi aren't
> in Popp
> oder Hopp 20, which is listed for Sabine.
> There is another unknown (at least for me) actress in the film.
> I will make a short review for this film in new thread.
------------------------------
???????????????????
No need to be sorry for being late..
But, not sorry about confusing people?!?!
I never stated Sabine is in that particular film...
Did I?
I ONLY say: Sabine = Babsi!
No more, no less!
And, as we has it all before, I don't get your point at all!
See posts from 11-24-16
Please prove where I'm wrong concerning Sabine = Babsi
and I shall speak no more!
Like I said: I never confirmed Sabine to be in that film she is listed for!
DID I??
NO!
Correct me, if I'm wrong!
Don't know what you are talking about, actually...
Re: Sabine [10] = Babsi [2]
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 6:20 pm
Well the Popp oder Hopp 20 entry seems to be wrong.
Cover:
[IMG]http://thumbnails104.imagebam.com/55176/e924dc551758502.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails104.imagebam.com/55176/a8654d551758517.jpg[/IMG]
5 Girls on cover. 4 are listed.
Anastasia [8]
correct
Laura Picasso
correct (nelly tat)
Missing:
Sandra [18] as Sandra
http://www.egafd.com/actresses/details.php/id/s00875
Anna-Lena
http://www.egafd.com/actresses/details.php/id/a00853
Last one - don't know her and I did just a quick shot from a stream.
[IMG]http://thumbnails104.imagebam.com/55176/f8edec551758522.jpg[/IMG]
Really don't understand who are you talking about.
The one in the first post has at least those crooked teeth.
Last one in PoH 20 should be another girl. But as said - I just skipped very fast through a bad quality stream. At least the PoH 20 entry is wrong.
Cover:
[IMG]http://thumbnails104.imagebam.com/55176/e924dc551758502.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails104.imagebam.com/55176/a8654d551758517.jpg[/IMG]
5 Girls on cover. 4 are listed.
Anastasia [8]
correct
Laura Picasso
correct (nelly tat)
Missing:
Sandra [18] as Sandra
http://www.egafd.com/actresses/details.php/id/s00875
Anna-Lena
http://www.egafd.com/actresses/details.php/id/a00853
Last one - don't know her and I did just a quick shot from a stream.
[IMG]http://thumbnails104.imagebam.com/55176/f8edec551758522.jpg[/IMG]
Really don't understand who are you talking about.
The one in the first post has at least those crooked teeth.
Last one in PoH 20 should be another girl. But as said - I just skipped very fast through a bad quality stream. At least the PoH 20 entry is wrong.
Re: Sabine [10] = Babsi [2]
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 6:32 pm
> correct (nelly tat)
>
Meant: Belly tat - Not:
Ah ok - now read all posts 2 times and think I understood them finally. Think deezer never said that you are wrong (as he doesn't know her) and just checked her entries and found out that one of her entries doesn't match to your ID - which lead him to question your ID (while not saying that you are wrong in general as he stated that he doesn't know her).
I don't know her either but apparently you both are right - as she is not in PoH 20 IMO.
>
Meant: Belly tat - Not:
Ah ok - now read all posts 2 times and think I understood them finally. Think deezer never said that you are wrong (as he doesn't know her) and just checked her entries and found out that one of her entries doesn't match to your ID - which lead him to question your ID (while not saying that you are wrong in general as he stated that he doesn't know her).
I don't know her either but apparently you both are right - as she is not in PoH 20 IMO.
Re: Sabine [10] = Babsi [2]
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:11 pm
Johray1 wrote:
> deezer wrote:
>
> > Sorry for beeing late, but are you sure that they are the same?
> > I can't say, because I didn't see a scene of her/them.
> > But anyhow, before a merge, please consider, that Sabine and/or
> > Babsi aren't in Popp oder Hopp 20, which is listed for Sabine.
> > There is another unknown (at least for me) actress in the film.
> > I will make a short review for this film in new thread.
> ------------------------------
>
> ???????????????????
>
>
> No need to be sorry for being late..
>
> But, not sorry about confusing people?!?!
>
> I never stated Sabine is in that particular film...
> Did I?
You didn't. And I never said, that you did.
But Popp oder Hopp 20 is the only film in Sabine [10]'s entry...
> I ONLY say: Sabine = Babsi!
> No more, no less!
Yes, that's what you said.
As I don't know Sabine, except from the two images of her gallery, which are
both taken from the inflagranti-website and unfortunately don't show, if
she has the same tatt or teeth as Babsi, I took a look at Popp oder
Hopp 20, to see a bit more of her.
> And, as we has it all before, I don't get your point at all!
>
> See posts from 11-24-16
>
I know this thread, especially this post of olimanu concerning her:
>>olimanu wrote:
>> The girl of scene 4 is listet at Inflagranti as Sabine
>> it is not Babsi (Nicole) who is also listed there.
olimanu says, that Sabine @inflagranti and Nicole @inflagranti are
different girls. AND he says, that Sabine @inflagranti (which is the one from
where the images of Sabine [10]'s gallery are taken) isn't Babsi!
draker states in the same thread, that Babsi is Nicole @iafd.
iafd uses a image from Nicole's profile-page @inflagranti as her headshot.
So there are some possibilities:
- olimanu is wrong and Sabine and Nicole @inflagranti are the same person.
- iafd is wrong and uses the headsot from a wrong person.
- you are wrong and Sabine @inflagranti/Sabine [10] and Babsi [2] aren't
the same person.
Isn't it allowed to be sceptic, having this diverging opinions and only two
images of her at hand?
> Please prove where I'm wrong concerning Sabine = Babsi
> and I shall speak no more!
It was, it is and it will not be my intention to prove you are wrong.
I'm only searching for additional images of Sabine, to make it doubtless, at
least for me, that you are right.
> Like I said: I never confirmed Sabine to be in that film she is
> listed for!
> DID I??
>
> NO!
> Correct me, if I'm wrong!
As I mentioned above, you didn't say, that she is in that film.
> Don't know what you are talking about, actually...
I'm talking about the fact, that we have an egafd-entry for Sabine [10],
who has only one film listed, but she doesn't appear in that film.
So, if that film is taken away from her filmography, what's then?
The discussion then has to be:
Is Sabine @inflagranti = Nicole @inflagranti = Babsi [2]?
Btw, I think I know what you are talking about, but I don't know why
you are taking my post personally!
> deezer wrote:
>
> > Sorry for beeing late, but are you sure that they are the same?
> > I can't say, because I didn't see a scene of her/them.
> > But anyhow, before a merge, please consider, that Sabine and/or
> > Babsi aren't in Popp oder Hopp 20, which is listed for Sabine.
> > There is another unknown (at least for me) actress in the film.
> > I will make a short review for this film in new thread.
> ------------------------------
>
> ???????????????????
>
>
> No need to be sorry for being late..
>
> But, not sorry about confusing people?!?!
>
> I never stated Sabine is in that particular film...
> Did I?
You didn't. And I never said, that you did.
But Popp oder Hopp 20 is the only film in Sabine [10]'s entry...
> I ONLY say: Sabine = Babsi!
> No more, no less!
Yes, that's what you said.
As I don't know Sabine, except from the two images of her gallery, which are
both taken from the inflagranti-website and unfortunately don't show, if
she has the same tatt or teeth as Babsi, I took a look at Popp oder
Hopp 20, to see a bit more of her.
> And, as we has it all before, I don't get your point at all!
>
> See posts from 11-24-16
>
I know this thread, especially this post of olimanu concerning her:
>>olimanu wrote:
>> The girl of scene 4 is listet at Inflagranti as Sabine
>> it is not Babsi (Nicole) who is also listed there.
olimanu says, that Sabine @inflagranti and Nicole @inflagranti are
different girls. AND he says, that Sabine @inflagranti (which is the one from
where the images of Sabine [10]'s gallery are taken) isn't Babsi!
draker states in the same thread, that Babsi is Nicole @iafd.
iafd uses a image from Nicole's profile-page @inflagranti as her headshot.
So there are some possibilities:
- olimanu is wrong and Sabine and Nicole @inflagranti are the same person.
- iafd is wrong and uses the headsot from a wrong person.
- you are wrong and Sabine @inflagranti/Sabine [10] and Babsi [2] aren't
the same person.
Isn't it allowed to be sceptic, having this diverging opinions and only two
images of her at hand?
> Please prove where I'm wrong concerning Sabine = Babsi
> and I shall speak no more!
It was, it is and it will not be my intention to prove you are wrong.
I'm only searching for additional images of Sabine, to make it doubtless, at
least for me, that you are right.
> Like I said: I never confirmed Sabine to be in that film she is
> listed for!
> DID I??
>
> NO!
> Correct me, if I'm wrong!
As I mentioned above, you didn't say, that she is in that film.
> Don't know what you are talking about, actually...
I'm talking about the fact, that we have an egafd-entry for Sabine [10],
who has only one film listed, but she doesn't appear in that film.
So, if that film is taken away from her filmography, what's then?
The discussion then has to be:
Is Sabine @inflagranti = Nicole @inflagranti = Babsi [2]?
Btw, I think I know what you are talking about, but I don't know why
you are taking my post personally!
Re: Sabine [10] = Babsi [2]
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 10:10 pm
deezer wrote:
> Btw, I think I know what you are talking about, but I don't
> know why
> you are taking my post personally!
-------------------------------------
There is no personal issue at all.
How come you think there is?!
!sad!
The obvious "problem" in here is to two talk about two different
matters at the same time:
- 1. Sabine = Babsi: Yes/No
- 2. Sabine isn't part of the film she is listed for.
I don't know "POH 20"... so Sabine might be in it, or not.
If Sabine isn't in "POH 20" there won't be anything left to merge.
To find out about it would be a great side-effect of my initial post.
Still, it wouldn't tell about Sabine being Babsi, or not, right?!
That's what I think about what could make you think there are
"personal issues"...
I'm simply not happy with discussing it like this...
> Btw, I think I know what you are talking about, but I don't
> know why
> you are taking my post personally!
-------------------------------------
There is no personal issue at all.
How come you think there is?!
!sad!
The obvious "problem" in here is to two talk about two different
matters at the same time:
- 1. Sabine = Babsi: Yes/No
- 2. Sabine isn't part of the film she is listed for.
I don't know "POH 20"... so Sabine might be in it, or not.
If Sabine isn't in "POH 20" there won't be anything left to merge.
To find out about it would be a great side-effect of my initial post.
Still, it wouldn't tell about Sabine being Babsi, or not, right?!
That's what I think about what could make you think there are
"personal issues"...
I'm simply not happy with discussing it like this...
Re: Sabine [10] = Babsi [2]
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 7:26 pm
Answering to jj in the thread, where it belongs:-)
jj wrote:
> I almost hesitate to ask....
And I almost hesitate to answer...
> were does that leave us with Babsi [2]/ Sabine [10]?
It only proves, that neither Babsi [2] nor Sabine [10] are in PoH 20, which
is the only film, of Sabines [10]'s egafd-filmo. Taken that film away, there
is no film in Sabine [10]'s entry.
To me it is pointless to merge two entries, if one of them is empty.
OTOH you copied the images of Sabine [10], which are doubtless taken
from Sabine's inflagranti-profile to Babsi [2]'s gallery.
I'm not 100% convinced, that Sabine is Babsi [2]. I can't prove it's her and I
can't prove it isn't her. They look very similar, but I'm not sure. In the end
it's your decision, to use this images for Babsi [2]'s or not.
That's all from my side.
As I wrote before:
>The discussion then has to be:
>Is Sabine @inflagranti = Nicole @inflagranti = Babsi [2]?
Here are some images for comparison:
Babsi [2]
[IMG]http://thumbnails104.imagebam.com/55192/b88676551919473.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails102.imagebam.com/55192/3cf105551919487.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails102.imagebam.com/55192/250ce2551919504.jpg[/IMG]
Nicole @ iafd and @inflagranti
[IMG]http://thumbnails102.imagebam.com/55192/aecc0b551919516.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails102.imagebam.com/55192/50ee3e551919531.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails104.imagebam.com/55192/ac8c5d551919545.jpg[/IMG]
Sabine @ inflagranti
[IMG]http://thumbnails102.imagebam.com/55192/cd6312551919561.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails103.imagebam.com/55192/0c0956551919581.jpg[/IMG]
All in one image
[IMG]http://thumbnails104.imagebam.com/55192/21f803551919604.jpg[/IMG]
jj wrote:
> I almost hesitate to ask....
And I almost hesitate to answer...
> were does that leave us with Babsi [2]/ Sabine [10]?
It only proves, that neither Babsi [2] nor Sabine [10] are in PoH 20, which
is the only film, of Sabines [10]'s egafd-filmo. Taken that film away, there
is no film in Sabine [10]'s entry.
To me it is pointless to merge two entries, if one of them is empty.
OTOH you copied the images of Sabine [10], which are doubtless taken
from Sabine's inflagranti-profile to Babsi [2]'s gallery.
I'm not 100% convinced, that Sabine is Babsi [2]. I can't prove it's her and I
can't prove it isn't her. They look very similar, but I'm not sure. In the end
it's your decision, to use this images for Babsi [2]'s or not.
That's all from my side.
As I wrote before:
>The discussion then has to be:
>Is Sabine @inflagranti = Nicole @inflagranti = Babsi [2]?
Here are some images for comparison:
Babsi [2]
[IMG]http://thumbnails104.imagebam.com/55192/b88676551919473.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails102.imagebam.com/55192/3cf105551919487.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails102.imagebam.com/55192/250ce2551919504.jpg[/IMG]
Nicole @ iafd and @inflagranti
[IMG]http://thumbnails102.imagebam.com/55192/aecc0b551919516.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails102.imagebam.com/55192/50ee3e551919531.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails104.imagebam.com/55192/ac8c5d551919545.jpg[/IMG]
Sabine @ inflagranti
[IMG]http://thumbnails102.imagebam.com/55192/cd6312551919561.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://thumbnails103.imagebam.com/55192/0c0956551919581.jpg[/IMG]
All in one image
[IMG]http://thumbnails104.imagebam.com/55192/21f803551919604.jpg[/IMG]
Re: Sabine [10] = Babsi [2]
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2017 5:59 am
Nicole/Sabine seem top be the same.... and assuming the iafd note
on Nicole is correct, Babsi is likely the same too.
Opinions?
on Nicole is correct, Babsi is likely the same too.
Opinions?