egafd.com

Saw this on V*F:



Daniella was listed (because of egafd)- but she is not in that Movie.
http://www.egafd.com/films/details.php/id/i00526

Girl on the cover (Tochter Olga) is Olga 17
Fitness center scene - easily recognizeable by her smile and nose piercing (and no tatoos).


Reason might be similar hairstyle or that xhamster has "Tochter Olga" listed - but it is actually this movie: which features Daniella (and the other entries are correct too).

Don't know anything about the actresses in the real "Tochter Olga". Blond Milf is probably known. DL'ed and added huge thumbnail above.

ID's and scenebreakdown only seeing the screener.
Year: c. 2002 (from the filmography of the known actresses)

female cast:

Michaela Reich
Olga [17]
Bia [2]
unknown, looks familiar, (could be very early, slim Dana Delicious)

male cast:

Conny Dachs
Titus Steel
Andy Moon
Stefan Dolenga



1. Michaela Reich (BJ, vag, anal, cum on bush), Conny Dachs
2. Olga (BJ, vag, facial), Titus Steel
3. Bia (BJ, vag, facial???), Andy Moon
4. unknown (BJ, vag, CS???), Stefan Dolenga

@lgwin:
Please check the breakdown, and add what I missed.
Some individual caps for especially Michaela Reich and the unknown would be helpful also.

Thanks. It's clearly Olga on that cover.

deezer wrote:
> 1. Michaela Reich (BJ, vag, anal, cum on bush), Conny Dachs
> 2. Olga (BJ, vag, facial), Titus Steel
> 3. Bia (BJ, vag, facial???), Andy Moon
> 4. unknown (BJ, vag, CS???), Stefan Dolenga

1. yes
2. yes
3. yes
4. dunno what CS is.

Unknown is not Dana.
She speaks fluid german, dunno region but she says always "rischtisch" for richtig. Huge Mole on left upper arm/shoulder, tatoo on right lower back (not fully seen as covered by clothes. Originally probably brunette. She is good at this little dirty talk (which was mostly improvised in those flicks I guess).

lgwin wrote:

> deezer wrote:
> > 4. unknown (BJ, vag, CS???), Stefan Dolenga
>

> 4. dunno what CS is.

CS = Cumshot. Couldn't see it in the screener.


lgwin wrote:
> Unknown is not Dana.

Agree. But I think she is XNK7320 and probably XNK5579 also.

> Agree. But I think she is
> XNK7320
> and probably
> XNK5579
> also.

1. Yeah should be her, IMO.
2. Probably ...

Have no copy of those flicks - so I can't check the tat.

Thanks both.
Notes added against 5579/7320 pending confirmation.