egafd.com

Notice - temporary restriction on new profile types
Until the site re-write completes (slated for end of March) GlamourFinder is only considering new profiles as detailed below.

Photogrpahers are welcome to register as members WITHOUT a profile and we will notify you when the new site is ready.

We are doing this because the profile submission rate for approval of non-female model profiles on the current site is causing too much of an overhead. The new site will be streamlined to solve this and we need the time freed up to complete the re-write itself.

ONLY new profiles as follows will be considered:
?Female (by birth, not transfemale)
?Aged 18-39
?Seeking photographic modelling work (not escort work)
?Appearance - slim mainstream professional glamour model looks
?A scan/digital photo of a photo ID may be required (at our discretion)
?After creating your profile, upload a suitable photo of yourself (clearly showing face, non-nude up to semi-nude), followed by additional and more explicit poses as appropriate.
Note. The above does not affect existing member profiles, only new ones to restore balance on the site.

Accounts for profiles that are not approved will be closed and blocked

I wouldnt bother.
Leave well alone

So they are repositioning the site towards a more mainstream area. Fair enough.

That said, I knew him slightly from before he set it up and he's basically a nice guy and technically very good - my take (not that I've talked to him, though I id get a more personal, sorry but we're booting you because we're booting everyone, letter), GF makes no money, it costs him time and trouble, he's not in the industry so doesn't get the spin offs that makes AIR worthwhile for me, so he's decided "revenue or sod it".

And the next stage, logically, is to charge for membership, which puts them straight up against NM and PS at one end, and AIR - free at the other.

Lets face it - given the customer service over at NM and PS etc, they should be vulnerable. Technically I think he could do it. He needs a proper designer for the graphical side though.

PS is a free site but it don't do adult xxx models so it rules out 90% of the models on here, Paul is right the guy who owns GF is a nice guy but i can't understand the new rules because it will make the site the same as the other stereotyped model sites & that wouldn't be good.
AIR is the only site similar to GF & both are essential must have sites...slim, young, glossy models don't do as well as the mature models on GF as proved by their ratings, to refuse these girls that fetch it producers & photographers will be suicide for the site so maybe he is feed up & wants it to go under.

Kim x

See the post I have just put on the other thread.

No point in moaning as we have no influence over the changes, what is desperately needed is an alternative that is restricted to over 18 access only and is aimed at those offering and seeking adult work levels.

Thats right..i reckon my days are numbered as i'm a 50yr old nan, size 18 & i aint got glamour looks so i'm knackered lol!

Kim x

Hi Krystal,

Me and several other people cancelled their accounts a while back. There is a posting about this somewhere on here.

The '?Appearance - slim mainstream professional glamour model looks' is totally out of order.'

As far as I am concerned Glamourfinder can fuck off. Plain and simple - I'm not using it.

Stormchild69