Page 1 of 1

More intensive medical checks?

Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 9:27 pm
by belfast_birty

Re: More intensive medical checks?

Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 6:41 am
by one eyed jack


It will be hard to enforce and theres one thing people in th eporn industry dont like to do is being told what to do as they will do the very opposite.

Porn is the way it is because the people in it are doing the stuff you are not supposed to do and thats really what it means to be called "adult entertainment"

I've seen people do high trapeze acts, sword swallowing and fire eating. Porn is no different. It should be done by those who know what the hell it is they are doing


Re: More intensive medical checks?

Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 7:31 am
by one eyed jack
Was mentioned here also


Re: More intensive medical checks?

Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 8:25 am
by Dave Wells
See also :-


Re: More intensive medical checks?

Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 8:49 am
by videokim
I have always said one day condoms will be the norm if we like it or not but it depends on how far we want to progress compared to other world industries.
As porn evolves so will our sexual health awareness & it is something that will happen, if people choose to do this is another matter but like monthly certs they would guilty if they didn't follow suit.
Its still early days in UK porn & as we are not yet united enough none of this really matters anyway so enjoy what we have got.


Re: More intensive medical checks?

Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 8:54 am
by Josephine
I am all for condoms ,as our certs are only as good as the day they were done on, so they are meaningless. It also takes up to 10 days for Stds such as Gonorrhoea to develop .
Josephine


Re: More intensive medical checks?

Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 11:48 am
by one eyed jack
Or we could do away with all porn (except couples porn) then I can control it aaaaallll!

Mwah-har-har-har-haaaar!

Then everyone will be in a loving relationship and the only b/g condomless porn will be Real Couples.

Now that would be a good plot for the next James Bond movie with me as a mega maniac with an eye patch and boss of Jack Industries

The good thing about porn going condom will be that porn of old will become highly collectible or rather highly torrentable.


Re: More intensive medical checks?

Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 9:00 pm
by videokim
No one on here but us makes movies with condoms as they are in fear of the dreaded myth that it spoils porn, are we the luckiest producers in the UK as it don't affect us ? if more tried they would see we are not lucky & the fact people like seeing that condom porn promotes safe sex.
We are glad we can operate within our own safe network & feel sorry for others that take silly risks day in day out with all but a piece of worthless paper to say they are safe.
After this post we are bound to get the normal e-mails from models who can't post their views on condoms in fear of being black listed by certain groups, as we say half of the gonzo producers would have to give up overnight as only pro's can work with condoms & thats the real reason.
Come on guys prove me wrong...


Re: More intensive medical checks?

Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 7:58 am
by Dave Wells
"Now that would be a good plot for the next James Bond movie with me as a mega maniac with an eye patch and boss of Jack Industries."

He already exists in porn Terry and you know exactly who I'm on about !!!!!!!