egafd.com

Hi,

I've added a section about Idiots to AIR.

If you get people asking for higher levels, off camera interaction, escorting etc let me know and I can comment the offending profiles (so your name not attached), and delete those that attract multiple complaints.

Cheers

Just Had a guy book a shoot,solo,continental toys.. agreed date,venue,content / price everything, then it became "what are you doing tonite" "do you escort " and sex chat,irrelevant to our Supposed shoot .. At the point he called me, very late and drunk ,i emailed that he would have to pay a deposit,with the balance cash on arrival, and he got all shirty and said " im going to have to cancel as i dont like your atitude"..........He doesnt like MY attitude,after i indugled him with endless silly calls and email replies! ... (Oh,and If your reading this,no... What you dont like is being told NOT to call late at night when your drunk !) .... So , to you Paul i say "Thank You" as us girls suffer it,mostly in silence ,whilst trying to work out the genuine offers from the ones who get off on chatting about it..... and other genuine, amateur togs suffer for it also,untill they become known! You do us a great service doing this, as if a tog has been with you for a period of time,with no complaints,I would feel i can just get on with making the booking ,without all the silly games! .. If anyone wants to book a reliable model with a fun attitude who will turn up on time, prepared to give you a great shoot, Great - Consider SarahKellyxxx... But,If you wanna fon me for sexy chats........at least do it when im on Sky!wink!

I assume any of these people who are accussed will have the right to reply like we set up on otherwise you will be providing a one way right to reply for models only. How about producers that are lead on an endless chase and screwed over?

You're a trooper Sarah, and next time you're lining up a content shoot, let me know.

Cheers

BTW was he from my site? If so, drop me a line - his username is included in the text of the initial email.

Rons right Paul. Models and producers should be given a right to reply and also would help for you to remain neutral and let the accused know there is something negative up about them so that they can reply if they want to.

You know as well as I do that the real guilty party would never take you to court for all their idle threats. Especially since most of them hide behind pseudonyms with hotmail accounts.

The more sites that partake in this the more we can reduce the bullshit happening out there right now.

yes,its all good....The bottom line being,if your open and honest with people then you wont have many/any point the finger at you...A right to reply would be usefull,and Paul would need judge cases on merit... eg.. I know EVERYONE on this thread (myself excluded) to be of the Highest Integrity!banana!...We won`t mention peoples little foibles....But when Paul gets a ridiculous amount of things said regards said about a Tog (or Model) , then , no smoke without fire kinda thing... But the idea its all good and certainly has its merits x

Hope you won't need to get extra staff in. Purestorm ops spend a stupid amount of time dealing with feedback issues. Some of these can be dealt with as long as the communications are done via the messaging system on the site as the proof is there. Once it goes off site then there's no chance of proving anything and a compromise needs to be reached and nobody wins.

Good luck with it and I hope it works out.

At the moment TOGs are quite happy to state NO SHOW or such and I find that if several do, it's usually for a model who I already suspect.

What I want to do is encourage the Models to flag the sleezy types.

My issue is that too many idiots scares away good models, esp those who have lower limits.

Rights of reply are always there of course.

What's the point exactly ? It's been happening for ever and will do forever, whatever you try and do.

I won't be resolving issues, just allowing them to be flagged.

I don't even care about who'se right or wrong, what i care about is "which guys manage to annoy a lot of girls", because I don't want them.

Annoy one girl, that's happenstance and chemistry.
Annoy two, it's co-inicidence.
Annoy 6, and it's a pattern of behavior.