Page 1 of 4
Re: 3000? modelling: part two
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:46 pm
by one eyed jack
No escorts No sex workers
I'm confused.
Arent porn stars classed as sex workers???
Some even escort but I doubt they will tell you that.
Re: 3000? modelling: part two
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 3:24 pm
by MelodyChase
Hiya,
so did the first one go ahead and can we have the name of the model so as to obtain a reference.
many thanks in advance
Melodyx
Re: 3000? modelling: part two
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 3:29 pm
by The Toybox
Three thousand quid?
I should think whoever she was, she's retired on that
Re: 3000? modelling: part two
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 3:43 pm
by rebecca ryder
yeah hun, i requested a reference to this ad on harmony? x
Re: 3000? modelling: part two
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 4:31 pm
by Ron T. Storm
I love Friday night comedy. This beats the shitty 'My Family' crap on BBC1... Mind you that isn't difficult.
Re: 3000? modelling: part two
Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:54 pm
by one eyed jack
Why not just say who you worked with?
I think its quite reasonable for girls to know so they can have a source of reference OR Melody doent need to name names but she can tell us that indeed you did work with someone so that we all know you are legit.
Thats all. We havent got pitch forks out on you mate but in this age of scam merchants you cant blame people for tkaing the high ground on this.