egafd.com

Hello there!

I'm looking for female models aged 18-35 (ish) for B/G shoots taking place in London over the coming months.

The shoot will consist of one solo stills set and a 30-60 minute b/g video. Certs not required as protection will be used for penetration. Industry standard rates will be paid.

Preference given to models in the local (London) area as transport costs will not be covered.

Please email 3 standard photo's (nude not required) plus your stats (height, size etc) and I'll get back to you with any further details you may require.

New and established models welcome to apply.

Thanks,

Martin

Roberts_ Productions wrote:

'Certs not required as protection will be used for penetration'.

So no oral will be taking place either then? STIs can be caught that way too.

Excerpt from NHS website:

STIs that are commonly caught through oral sex are:

chlamydia
gonorrhoea
genital herpes
syphilis

Infections that are less frequently passed on through oral sex include:

HIV
hepatitis A, hepatitis B and hepatitis C
genital warts
pubic lice

I don't understand why people still want to shoot without certs? Protection or not it's just another weak link in the chain of staying safe and not very professional either.

Sorry rant over, it just winds me up that a company would wish to shoot this way when it is so easy, (and free), for everyone to get tested these days

I'm with you willie

I have to agree too Willie.

Shooting/performing without certificates is totally irresponsible even if condoms are used and, as you say Willie, STI's can also be spread by oral.

Another point I'd like to make. I notice that this is the first post here by "Roberts_Productions". Are they a new production company/business and are they able to provide references to any girls who may be interested in working for them?

Myson
!oldie!

not arguing with either, but might it not be theoretically safer to perform without tests and with protection, rather than with tests and no protection?

obviously with tests carried out that day and within full body condoms is safest!

I dont think you should be to hasty to condemn shoots with protection but without certs, there will always be risk whichever way you go and a lot of the girls do escort work with just protection and it must be better than nothing at all...

Well done Willie for raising awareness and listing the infections you can get from oral.

Boab -
Yes protection without certs is safer than certs alone providing protection is used for oral too with only safe pop shots ie boobs, stomach or feet

(if you check out my latest 2 dogging missions on you will see that i am using protection for oral scenes as they where done with non-certified members of the public)

Maybe Robert didn't know that he could spread or catch sti's from oral

Robert -
now you have been made aware of this fact could you please reply letting us girls know if you are happy for protection to be used for oral too?

Luv Tanya

X

--

References from previous models CAN be provided.

I think it's very naive and indeed blatantly stupid to assume infections are spread via unprotected oral.

This shoot is not suggesting that takes place.

However, I would like to point out that old argument of the fact a CERT is only good at the precise moment in which it's taken.

How many people have caught STI's during shoots where everyone involved has a clean cert?! PLENTY.

Infection is rife in the industry and is not simply due to protected shoots.

Spread ^solely^ via unprotected oral.

Roberts correct.

He didn't mention there would be any oral in his opening post. Not sure why you're all so keen to jump down his throat (no pun intended).

Please let's not rehash the old certs-incubation-period discussion..there's rugby to watch on TV, chestnuts to gather!