Page 1 of 1

Lana Cox and The Tower

Posted: Tue May 20, 2003 9:10 am
by David
Just read Lana's entry and it says that a doble was used for anal scenes. Is this correct? Why would they use a stunt bum?

Re: Lana Cox and The Tower

Posted: Tue May 20, 2003 9:58 am
by alec
We wouldn't have put that in if we didn't think it was correct. The information came from a post made by the lady herself on the newsgroup alt.fan.televisionx a few years ago, and having seen the video, in my opinion the evidence does not contradict her. She said anal was too painful. I know there is a photoset which includes anal, but anal for stills might be bearable, anal for film might not, and in any case this might be the occasion that made up her mind that anal was too painful.

Rather than a repetition of arguments already rehearsed, those who disagree might like to search the Archive forum where those disagreements have been stated before.

Re: Lana Cox and The Tower

Posted: Tue May 20, 2003 10:04 am
by bryan
seen it,it is all lana.

Re: Lana Cox and The Tower

Posted: Tue May 20, 2003 3:51 pm
by Dave Wells
Yes it is correct, it is Lisa Stretton arse I think.

Re: Lana Cox and The Tower

Posted: Tue May 20, 2003 4:19 pm
by JP
I saw that scene last night on sex view, Lana appeared to have a tatoo on her ass and in the anal scene the model also had the same tatoo, either it was Lana or Private paid attention to detail.

JP

Re: Lana Cox and The Tower

Posted: Tue May 20, 2003 5:11 pm
by Ace
The butterfly tattoo? I was convinced it was comrade Lana, but she swears it was a double.

Re: Lana Cox and The Tower

Posted: Tue May 20, 2003 6:04 pm
by Wheeley
All I will say is, check out the small "wart" near the said arse, a double with the same "wart", what are the odds?

Re: Lana Cox and The Tower

Posted: Tue May 20, 2003 6:15 pm
by David
If it is Lisa Stretton's arse and not Lana's, then why not use Lisa for the whole scene (no pun intended). Lana was not the star of the film - only a bitpart actor (but what bits!!). Why go to the trouble of getting someone in for just that part (again no pun intended)? It doesn't make sense...I can't see Private going to the expense of hiring a stunt arse for that one scene.