Recent Cuts

[joe king]

ROCCO SIFFREDI ,3 titles cut June to July 2001.
>
>MORE OF WHAT MEN WANT - ice in vagina ?
>ROCCO RAVISHES PRAGUE 3 - repeated, aggressive,deep thrusting into mouth
>causing gagging; head forced into urinal during aggressive fellatio,
>sexual violence
>ANAL SERVICE -degrading title, asphixia
>PLEASE 12 - MORE SEXUAL SUPERSTARS -forcibly restrained in a sexual scenario
>ROCCO'S SEXUAL SUPERSTARS - 'strong abuse, and violence' ?
>MANEUVERS: AGONY OF VICTORY - licking urine and cigar close to penis?
>BARELY LEGAL #3 - urolagnia
>NAUGHTY YOUNG LESBIANS - title change

[Jeff]

Hmmm.

I reckon Siffredi's a bit of a c*nt to be honest, I wouldn't willingly watch the guy's movies. He's worked with Amanda Dawkins though I haven't seen the film - I hope he doesn't do anything sick to beautiful Amanda. That would make me hate him.

But even with my relatively new-man taste in porn, I don't see what's degrading about "anal service".

[pasta]

Jeff wrote:
>
> Hmmm.
>
> I reckon Siffredi's a bit of a c*nt to be honest, I wouldn't
> willingly watch the guy's movies. He's worked with Amanda
> Dawkins though I haven't seen the film - I hope he doesn't do
> anything sick to beautiful Amanda. That would make me hate him.
>

He gives her a good old shagging with a fair bit of spanking.
Though how you know what sort of guy he is while willingly admitting you won't watch his movies, I don't know. Please bear in mind that what you see onscreen often has little to do with real life.

> But even with my relatively new-man taste in porn, I don't
> see what's degrading about "anal service".

Nothing really. The title was changed to that from "Service Animals" - which was considered degrading.

[Steve]

For what its worth(a lot).My view of recent discussions about rocco are isnt everybody going over the top.Are we not talking about actors here?

[johnEuk]

"Are we not talking about actors here?"

What aspect Steve? - That their "discomfort" is an act, or that "they're only actors anyway, so who gives a shit?"

I've seen some of his stuff, and it didn't appeal to me. I didn't find the apparently non-consentient "abuse" of the women arousing personally - acted or for real. I know from experience that some women find spanking, fisting, hair pulling, heavy anal etc arousing - but if they don't genuinely enjoy it, why bother?

- That's what concerns me about his work, that (particularly young inexperienced) guys will take it as a roll model, and go out and push girls beyond their comfort threshold - and they ain't actresses with a contract etc etc

[Steve]

Their 'apparent' discomfort is an act is what I mean john.Presumably the girls give their consent before filming what is to take place and if they dont like it they can call a halt ,just like in real life.It doesn't particularly appeal to me either but someone must like it

[johnEuk]

Steve's -
"Their 'apparent' discomfort is an act is what I mean john. Presumably the girls give their consent before filming what is to take place and if they dont like it they can call a halt ,just like in real life."

Yeah OK - so they're acting.

I did recently read however that Dick Nasty (the UK guy who has that squirting big-blonde Stephanie Duval woman as a squeeze?) also manages actresses, and is renowned for "coercing" them into doing stuff they don't want to do.

Also noticed Sarah Jane Hamilton on several occasions giving the "T" timeout sign when she wanted a break from being plundered by a guy with a BIG cock - they just kept right on nailing her to the bed, and she obviously wasn't enjoying it.

It isn't all sweetness and roses dressed up like a dungeon.

"It doesn't particularly appeal to me either but someone must like it"
Makes you wonder about the guys who do.