Selective deletion of posts

[snapperman]

I see the model booking sites thread has been closed which is fair enough. But what is not fair is selective deletion of posts to make an argument go one way which is what has been done.

[Lizard]

When you own your own forum Snapper, you can decide what stays and what goes, until then you just have to accept the mods bidding, end of story.

[snapperman]

Lizard wrote:

> When you own your own forum Snapper, you can decide what
> stays and what goes, until then you just have to accept the
> mods bidding, end of story.
>
>


Not quite a forum exists because of users. If the mods want to run a biased and crap forum then they can but it will be pointed out to people so they are warned.

[crashsixtynine3]

Its ironic that the people who are against censorship are the ones who are keenest to exercise it when something that they disagree with, is posted.

Isn't "Moderation" another word for "Censoring"?

Just an observation!

[Cornish Chris]

How do you know the moderators of this board are against censorship ??

just an observation!

[snapperman]

Well many people have mailed me and told me that this Joe A character is well know for making flame wars on forums. He seems to have a bit of a problem i think a bit of jealousy might be it. Looking at his web site and forum which no one uses i think he is trying to disrupt other forums. But you're right you would expect a porn site like this to have mods who are against censoring especially selective censoring but obviously this Joe A is part of the scene here.

crashsixtynine3 wrote:

> Its ironic that the people who are against censorship are the
> ones who are keenest to exercise it when something that they
> disagree with, is posted.
>
> Isn't "Moderation" another word for "Censoring"?
> Just an observation!
>
>

[woodgnome]

so anyone should be allowed into anyone elses home to do and say as they like - otherwise it's censorship? for your information, this forum is not the virtual equivalent of a public footpath, with a right of way to anyone who wishes to pass through.

in other words, we are NOT a bastion of free speech - we are a web site dedicated to brit porn and it's female performers. if we controlled the whole web, THEN we could possibly be accused of censorship in the manner of a supreme dictator... but happily for you (and us) we don't.

btw, if you (or joe a) persist in continuing this spat on the forum, you both risk having your profiles deleted.

[alec]

The posts deleted contained personal abuse which is against the FAQ 3.7.1; so you had been warned.

[snapperman]

alec wrote:

> The posts deleted contained personal abuse which is against
> the FAQ 3.7.1; so you had been warned.

If that is true then the following posts by Joe A should have been removed as they make claims against someone who does not even use this forum such as claiming he is a spammer I have mailed him to tell him about what are libellous comments. Joe A also suggest people should mistrust me which i think is personal abuse. So why were these left and mine removed?

http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=2&i=22072&t=21955

http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=2&i=22024&t=21955

http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=2&i=22005&t=21955

I have no probs with posts being removed and threads being closed only with selective and biased removal and closing.