Attn: jon/alan re. escorting
-
woodgnome
Attn: jon/alan re. escorting
for the five millionth time, please read section 2.3 of the site faq. threads on this topic will be deleted.
-
Alan
Re: Attn: jon/alan re. escorting
thats fair enough, but we replied legitimately to a topic that was posted in the first place. Surely you boys at this great site should vet the new topics before they are posted, that way, replies like ours wouldnt make it on because you would have decided the original topic was not in the best interests to the girls/readers etc.
-
woodgnome
Re: Attn: jon/alan re. escorting
if i sounded a little ticked off it's because this particular breach of the faq keeps recurring. before making posts to any forum people should familiarize themselves with the site faq. it's basic netiquette and if everyone followed it far fewer deletions would be necessary. it only takes five minutes, after all.
messages aren't vetted prior to posting because it isn't practical given the amateur nature of the site and it's limited resources. most o.t. posts aren't vexatious but made in ignorance of the site faq, with the vast majority being perfectly ok.
having said that, there may be some changes in the way in which off topic posts are dealt with. if anything materialises a post will be made to the forum with all the details.
messages aren't vetted prior to posting because it isn't practical given the amateur nature of the site and it's limited resources. most o.t. posts aren't vexatious but made in ignorance of the site faq, with the vast majority being perfectly ok.
having said that, there may be some changes in the way in which off topic posts are dealt with. if anything materialises a post will be made to the forum with all the details.