Re: Extreme Pornography Consultation

BGAFD Admin · Post by **BGAFD Admin** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 2:40 pm

It has been necessary to close the above thread (Extreme Pornography Consultation) in order to pin it to the top of the forum for a while, so please use this thread instead to add any comments.

Apologies to myson and Cerberus who had already added responses which had to be removed as a side-effect. I've copied your posts below.

BGAFD Admin · Post by **BGAFD Admin** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 2:41 pm

myson wrote:

> Just a suggestion but maybe the BGAFD as a group could respond
> to this?
>
> Myson

BGAFD Admin · Post by **BGAFD Admin** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 2:41 pm

Cerberus wrote:

> Hmm, a most interesting & perplexing tome. I wonder how long it
> will be after responding before Mr Plod et all come around &
> kick respondants front doors in?

randyandy · Post by **randyandy** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 6:27 pm

in response to Cereberus

Their not allowed to.

This is an opportunity to give your views.

They may listen, they may not but it's a chance to say what you think.

fishophile · Post by **fishophile** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 7:47 pm

Just sent off my 2p worth.

My view is that no material posed by models giving informed consent needs banning. [Kids, animals and dead people cannot, of course, give informed consent].

On all US sites and videos you see the "2257" statement - so everyone can prove the perfomers are of age, and have given consent. Does such a system exist in any form here? Should it?