R18 cuts - October

A read-only and searchable archive of posts made to the BGAFD forum from 11/08/2000 to 14/03/2003.
Locked
joe king

R18 cuts - October

Post by joe king »

102 LOVE POSITIONS
urolagnia

JAILHOUSE - BOYS IM KNAST
abusive scenario

CUMBACK PUSSY 39
asphyxiative sex

YOUNG, BLOND & FULL OF CUM!
sight of spade handle penetrating anus
urolagnia (man peeing on chest of other)

NACKTE SUNDE
still images of animation-style child and Japanese cartoon character, and teenage animation-style characters involved in sexually explicit acts on the grounds of potential harm

BARELY LEGAL 6
two references to underage children engaging in sexual activity

INITIATIONS #3
man throttling a woman during sex

BARELY LEGAL #5
two lines of dialogue which described sexual activity by females when they were underage

CAPE TOWN
dialogue references to depictions of adults role-playing as non-adults
woodgnome

Re: R18 cuts - October

Post by woodgnome »



and here are the people responsible for saving us from ourselves:
Mr Magoo

Re: R18 cuts - October

Post by Mr Magoo »

When I think of the number of gonzo films where girls have been asked how old they were when they first had sex the answer is usuaully somewhere between 14-18. I remember a girl in an Ed Powers film saying 12 and Ed quite rightly told her that was too young and changed the subject. He had the sense to realise that that sort of talk could attract peados so he imposed a form of self censorship. This is a tricky area for the bbfc because the truth is that girls do have sex underage. Everyone has seen kids in there own area having babies before they are 16. But I think the bbfc are probably right for once in that whilst underage sex is an OK subject for the tabloid press to sensationalise it is not apropriate for porn because of the context of a porn film being designed to arouse. Less intelligent men may assume all underage girls are up for it. These type of porn users would not come to our attention because they would have no interest in a site like this. Many men convicted of sexual offences against children cannot even read.

But what the hell the bbfc/police have against pissing scenes is beyond me. Would a jury be likely to find watersports obscene when heavy handed stuff like Rocco is legal? I doubt it. But the bbfc have to go with police advice and we all know what an enlightened modern thinking bunch of people the Old Bill are. Things will not change unless there are more failed prosecutions of uncertificated material. But how will this happen now that everyone is shooting to bbfc guidelines for r18?
joe king

Re: R18 cuts - October

Post by joe king »

tis legal for under 16 to have sex with under 16
Mr Magoo

Re: R18 cuts - October

Post by Mr Magoo »

Joe these scenes (dialogue) which are cut often refer to legal sex between people of the same age.
johnEuk

Re: R18 cuts - October

Post by johnEuk »

It astounds me that the BBFC don't have the balls to even pass DISCUSSION on subjects not in their guidelines. I currently have a video with them in which the (comfortably over 18) girls are factually asked at what age they started having sex, and they give an equally factual answer. I seem to remember that they were all under 18 - so we'll see...

Even worse, one of the girls says she enjoys being fisted, and lucidly explains why. I guess that will freak them out as well.

This head-in-the-sand attitude is dangerous IMO.
Mr Magoo

Re: R18 cuts - johnEuk

Post by Mr Magoo »

Let us know what happens with your films. The conflicting and contradictory rules in this countries cencorship of films are fascinating.
Locked