Re: Keeley Hazel Tape Thread

randyandy · Post by **randyandy** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 7:30 am

Can one of the mods let me know why this thread has been closed and my post with the free link to it removed please?

As I said in my post I've never heard of her and to be honest not bothered the thread has been closed its just that my curiosity has got the better of me and would like to know why.

Normally when something is posted the author gets Attn:........ then the reason it has been removed/ moved etc but this hasn't happened on this occasion and I've noticed that the thread on the subject is still going on the Promotions Forum.

If one of the mods can reply to this here or delete this and let me know by email it would be appreciated.

Thanks

Andy

planeterotica · Post by **planeterotica** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 7:38 am

Hi randyandy, my links to this film were also removed but i dont mind, i suspect the reason is that this is a freesite which cost money to run and the mods make it pay by people clicking on to the affilliate banners and on this occassion they could see a chance to make a few bob and by removing our links then people would click on their banners and i dont blame them one bit good luck to them !love!

Johnnyboy 22 · Post by **Johnnyboy 22** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 7:40 am

Ill tell you why i think it was removed, because the people that first got there hands on the Keeley tape were strictlybroadband.com. And they post in this section, so i dont think they were taking to kindly to seeing free links. Thats why i didnt even post it, although i would have liked to. Thats my opinion any way.

Dace · Post by **Dace** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:57 am

think the free one is a handheld camera recording of strictly broadbands footage directly from their website - which they aren't liking for obvious reasons, otherwise I think it would have been alright

as for the footage, apart from the BJ it reminded me a lot of looking at porn on TVX - i.e mainly some dirty talk and a blokes arse bobbing up and down

KJ · Post by KJ » Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:54 am

There's an element of hypocrisy in all of this - anybody posting or asking for private informantion about any of the adult stars contained in the database here finds their posts deleted (and rightly so). And yet the site is happy to contain ads for a private film which would appear to have been leaked without the consent of the main attraction.

I understand this site needs to raise money and hence has ads, but unless somebody can categorically state that Ms Hazell gave permission for the film to be broadcast then I have some difficulty with all of this.

Dace · Post by **Dace** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:09 am

these "sex tapes" are rarely released unintentionally - specially nowadays where it seems a good way to kick start your career

one eyed jack · Post by **one eyed jack** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:13 am

Alice in Blunderland wrote: ...why anybody would want to pay to see a few minutes of a half decent blowjob followed by 6 minutes of some guy's arse and an empty bed while they fumble around off screen is anybody's guess- another reason why celebrities should not make porn films

What you should have said is: They shouldve contacted Terry at Real Couples and he would have made a far better video...You would have seen it going in and out crystal clear. Not to mention a bit of info on them as a couple too !happy!

Jacques · Post by **Jacques** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:20 am

Ads? What ads? I can't see any ads.

/Firefox blog