Tamer than ever before.

[beewilson]

Sorry if this is not to be posted here but just wondering if anyone knew why Babestation has got so tame. I mean they don?t even get down to underwear till midnight. Also is it just me or are they all wearing big granny panties these days.

[beewilson]

It?s all-free as far as I?m aware and if not then I?ll be talking to sky. I?m not an avid viewer, just flick through the channels just like people do. I do like some of the girls on the show too but never enough to phone in and have a fake conversation at ?1.50 a min. All I was doing was making an observation.

[jj]

beewilson wrote:
> I mean they don’t even get down to underwear till midnight.
Maybe the central-heating timer's playing up. It IS still winter, you know....


> Also is it just me or are they all wearing big granny panties these days.
Apart from being thermally efficient [see above], those granny panties are
DAMN' sexy.
Bring back whale-bone !!!

[gdw]

If you think that's bad try watching naked news at 10pm on playboy one

from the waisti to the knees it is all blurred

waste of fucking time

[beewilson]

What?s the reason behind this sort of censorship? Is it because the government think that if under aged kids watch it there goner be scared or something. If anything 11 to 18 year olds want to watch porn more than adults in my opinion, and really dose it hurt. I mean my parents never stopped me from watching adult materiel as a teenager and I turned out fine.

[jj]

The government can't [or won't] realistically control the foul, antisocial
behaviour of many teenagers, so they console themselves with exercising
pointless censorship of a few titty-shows while permitting on-screen violence
that makes one shudder.

Consistent? Ha !

[blackjaques]

My view is that this "protection of children" reason for censorship is a compltete smokescreen. R18 is just too explicit for them and their right wing religious nutter friends. They're afraid that they might enjoy it themselves.

[jj]

blackjaques wrote:
> My view is that this "protection of children" reason for
> censorship is a compltete smokescreen.
Either that [which implies a rationality on the part of government that I
don't see any evidence for], or they're just idiots [for which there is
ample evidence].

> R18 is just too explicit
> for them and their right wing religious nutter friends.
It's more that they think it too explicit for US. This is a moral judgment
for the individual that government has no right to arrogate to itself, or
competence to make.