Fiona Cooper - aint cheap is it?

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of British born and British-based female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
Deuce Bigolo
Posts: 9910
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Fiona Cooper - aint cheap is it?

Post by Deuce Bigolo »

b/g I'd seriously doubt it as what made them popular was exclusivity
featuring models who came and went overnight

G/G scenes already exist they just dont seem to have a category for it on their websites

The likes of

patsy(laura Singer)and Linda(amy thomas)
angela(sammi walker) with maxine(sarah daniels),kathy shannon,kathryn(amanda long)

Just going through the listed films for FC under F will point you in the right direction if you want to avoid the soft

I've never quite understood why the CSB films were sort after
Apart from a few who never did b/g elsewhere like charlotte aka roxanne kedge fair enough but for those that did they all had far better scenes on offer
Kaye aka michelle wright being a very good example
Trumpton
Posts: 7649
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Fiona Cooper - aint cheap is it?

Post by Trumpton »

If you are prepared to fork out ?55 you'll receive 5 DVDs plus 1 extra DVD for that price. Only order via his catalogue though. Do not order via his websites!

I remember during the 90s Sutcliffe only featured very tame and boring single model tapes. The model would have to turn her back to the camera and you'd have to image what she was doing with her fingers

I think it was about 1999 when you started seeing toys used, anal toy use and talking was introduced.

As the time has passed Sutcliffe has gradually produced harder material including pissing, cock-sucking and M/F.

A tiny percentage of his output is good - but overall it's mind-numbingly banal and the same. You have to realise that Sutcliffe has a fetish of nylons and panties and the customers are left in doubt about that. Every scene features the model in panties and there is always a massive amount of close-ups on panties. Then there are the scenes where the model is not only wearing panties, but also nylon tights over them - and again there are tonnes of close-ups of this.

Also remember Sutcliffe does not like dirty-talking. This is strange because the sleaziest man in Britporn, with a litany of criminal convictions behind him, attempts to block the model from talking dirty.

So, if you enjoy seeing 95% of all the scenes devoted to close-ups of panties and nylon gussets, with the models talking in a Mills & Boon manner, then get your cheque book out and place an order.
Tony__T
Posts: 452
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Fiona Cooper - aint cheap is it?

Post by Tony__T »

I seem to remember Cate Harrington posting on here about how he was the weirdest guy she'd ever worked with, he made her feel very uncomfortable and wouldn't even let her bring a chaperone along to the shoot.

That, as well as his myriad of dodgy convictions and weird insistence on posing as a woman, has always made me very wary of giving him my money as a customer.
jj
Posts: 28225
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Fiona Cooper - aint cheap is it?

Post by jj »

If nothing else, he [and his various patent behavioural quirks]
have supplied all of us here with endless hours of fun, playing
parlour psychoanalysis: -)

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
jj
Posts: 28225
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Fiona Cooper - aint cheap is it?

Post by jj »

... now I think about it [and a sure sign of imminent decrepitude],
NOTHING's cheap nowadays [img]http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/smileys/oldie.gif[/img]

I mean, have you seen the price of eggs lately?

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
Post Reply