less than one in seven want 'porn filters'

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of British born and British-based female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
m100
Posts: 1507
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

less than one in seven want 'porn filters'

Post by m100 »

according to ofcom less than one in seven new broadband customers have opted to use the 'porn filters' which are the default option for new broadband customers amongst the major isp's.

David cameron's bollocks must really hurt cos he's just taken another massive kick to them.
m100
Posts: 1507
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: less than one in seven want 'porn filters'

Post by m100 »

we also have to consider whether a percentage of those who have accepted the porn filters have done so out of fear that they would end up on so government potential pervert list (it's going to be a long fucking list david!) or under duress from their partner etc.

can anyone think of any situation where the apparent wishes of such a small percentage of the population have even been considered let alone catered for and passed off as a majority view?
m100
Posts: 1507
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: less than one in seven want 'porn filters'

Post by m100 »

ha ha, that's funny where did that come from? if you haven't got a wife who you can prove you're not going to beat up do you have to get one or will they provide one on the day?
Arginald Valleywater
Posts: 4288
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: less than one in seven want 'porn filters'

Post by Arginald Valleywater »

Porn is bad but watching MMA at 1 minute past 9pm on SKY and BT Sport is fine. Sex bad. Violence good. What the censors fail to realise is porn has been around for thousands of years. No doubt the ancient Greeks enjoyed bit of erotic entertainment while writing great works and inventing modern society.
one eyed jack
Posts: 12414
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: less than one in seven want 'porn filters'

Post by one eyed jack »

Im sure he can get away with saying he looks at child pornography for investigative purposes

www.realcouples.com
www.onemanbanned.com
www.linkmojo.me/realcouples
www.twitter.com/realcouples
www.facebook.com/realcouples
Post Reply