Fiona Cooper

A read-only and searchable archive of posts made to the BGAFD forum from 11/08/2000 to 14/03/2003.
Rod Steward

Fiona Cooper

Post by Rod Steward »

Now that a major paedo pornographer is no longer exerting his
considerable and pernicious influence is there any chance that
we could have a return to the saner, more tasteful and infinitely
more arousing days when pubic hair was allowed and we weren't
required to make do with looking at women who had been brainwashed into believing that men want to look at women who
seem to be imitating the sexual maturity of a ten year old.
woodgnome

Re: Fiona Cooper

Post by woodgnome »

as most men possess the sexual maturity of a ten year old, there is a certain logic to it!
Big Jim

Re: Fiona Cooper

Post by Big Jim »

I think we're on dodgy ground on this one Rodders. I could be mistaken but are you implying that everyone who likes a smooth snatch is a paedophile?

As someone who shoots a heck of a lot of girl/girl, I know from the ladies that they prefer to go down on women who are at the very least partially shaven. Pubes can trap a lot of 'icky' things such as urine, menstrual blood, ky jelly, etc. (and God forbid - lice!)

Personally speaking, I like an 'American' - baldy flaps with a strip of pubes running along the pubis, but each to his or her own. If I'm on holiday and I see a woman on the beach with tons of hair trying to escape from her bikini bottoms, I feel physically ill.(and don't get me started if there's hair sticking out of the top of the bikini or worse the butt crack - eeeuuurghhh!)

Finally, here's something to think about. A friend of mine got over amourous with a girlfriend who was particularly hairy down there. He went to stick it in before she was ready and the hair across her entrance actually cut his foreskin.

No doubt this 'pubic' debate will run and run.
Caractacus

Re: Fiona Cooper

Post by Caractacus »

Hoi----I resemble that remark!
woodgnome

Re: Fiona Cooper

Post by woodgnome »

like you, i disagree with the premise of mr steward's paedophile insinuation (one he has made before in this forum) but urine? menstrual blood?? ky jelly???

have the young women of today never heard of good old fashioned soap and water?

i have several bars going spare, if anyone fancies a spot of spring cleaning!
woodgnome

Re: Fiona Cooper

Post by woodgnome »

worrying news for catuvellaunians everywhere!
jj

Re: Fiona Cooper

Post by jj »

A lady of my acquaintance, and a devoted muff-muncher in her spare time, once told me that she preferred partially-shaved partners for the deed, but that the one thing she couldn't stomach was recently- and liberally-applied vaginal deodorant.
And shavng certainly allows a better view of the proceedings on video.
Let's not start the natural vs. shaved debate again, as it's all been said before. Chacun a son gout.
richy

Re: Fiona Cooper

Post by richy »

I'm so upset by this, I've thrown my rattle out of my pram.
richy

Re: Fiona Cooper

Post by richy »

I'm sure many of us will agree with this, I'm afriad that half and ounce of Old Holborn poking out around her knickers is a huge turn off.
jj

Re: Fiona Cooper

Post by jj »

Absolutely. Golden Virginia's the only snout for me.
Locked