Close up or full body - what's your choice?

[Richard B]

I've noticed a real divide in porn producers.

Some favour lots of very close up shots of cock entering pussy - others prefer fully body shots, showing the girl's whole body (and, importantly, face) with the guy thrusting into her.

Reverse cowgirl (girl on top, facing away from bloke) is best for this.

My preference is for full body, and particularly reverse cowgirl (after all a close-up could be anybody). What does everyone else think?

[Mike C]

I tend to agree.
Close ups for me are a part of porn but they are the side dish and the main course is the woman in all her glory.
Her facial expression plays a major part in any scene she performs in. This is one criticism I had of Cathula, in every scene which featured Cathy I was hoping for more long shots of her glorious self but got a little bored with close ups of her pussy being played with.
OK it sounds daft to me as well now I read it, who could get bored with Cathy:)

[pi0n33r]

yes, i agree, what mike c said...

[jj]

Absolutely.
Close-ups are of course essential, but they should be set in proportion to the other shots.
My personal ratio, for preference, would be something like 25% close-ups, 50% near/middle-distance and 25% further away.
Hard to generalise, though. Must be a nightmare to get right (if you ever do, trying to please everyone).

[Buttsie Downunder]

Just buy it all

What you dig you keep and what you dont you trade.

For the record the shots wether near,middle or away have got to
be on the girls.No offense to the studs.

Cheers
buttsie
Oz

[nijario]

Yep, Definately full body shots!!


nijario