R18 Censorship

A place to socialise and share opinions with other members of the BGAFD Community.
joe king

Re: R18 Censorship

Post by joe king »

is that fake non-consensual sex/violence or real non-consensual sex/violence ?

So a riot on a football pitch - is that consensual or not?
mutanthalibut

Re: R18 Censorship

Post by mutanthalibut »

What point are you trying to make Joe?
I can't make out if you are saying that all forms of sex and violence are ok or that all forms of sex are ok but mainstream violence isn't.

The origonal point of this thread IMO was that the material that was censored was deemed to be sick which I tend to agree with. I don't however agree with censorship.
joe king

Re: R18 Censorship

Post by joe king »

So, do you agree that mainstream violence is sick?
marcusallen

Re: R18 Censorship

Post by marcusallen »

Joe,
Who you talking to? and what you mean by "mainstream violence"? Actual or Acted?
joe king

Re: R18 Censorship

Post by joe king »

both (acted and real violence) is it "sick"- I am talking to mutanthalibut.
mutanthalibut

Re: R18 Censorship

Post by mutanthalibut »

I think we have missed the origonal point. But to answer your question IMO if it's real i.e non-consensual then it's "sick".

What is your opinion?
Chairman Miaow

Re: R18 Censorship

Post by Chairman Miaow »

Mutant,
Its non-consensual at an execution.
marcusallen

Re: R18 Censorship

Post by marcusallen »

Sorry about that, The Chairman has been talking to J.Walker behind my back -hairy little divil
Anyway, violence is sometimes the only amswer. This has been tho before!
the Monkey Wrencher

FAO: Joe King

Post by the Monkey Wrencher »

Bearing your point in mind, you'll find the BBFC had refused certification in the past for compilations devoted to showing football violence. It's not just smut that they find offensive.
joe king

Re: FAO: Joe King

Post by joe king »

that was because the 'documentary' was less than condemnatory of the football hooligans and not because of the 'holiganism'.
Locked