breast feeding outside my house!

A place to socialise and share opinions with other members of the BGAFD Community.
Ace
Posts: 5879
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: breast feeding outside my house!

Post by Ace »

and a rusk for the baby
The West London of my youth is now on dvd


I've met the man on the street............and he's a cunt
Ace
Posts: 5879
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Paula Radcliffe!

Post by Ace »

Now she is seriously fit!!
The West London of my youth is now on dvd


I've met the man on the street............and he's a cunt
Cheeky Chappie UK
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Paula Radcliffe!

Post by Cheeky Chappie UK »

at least some are having a laugh about it .... was quite surprised at magoo being so angry about my post .... was only saying about the observational humour of the situation etc etc.

and at the end of the day (baby well and truly NOT in the equation) a fit woman with her tits out is just that .... a fit woman with her tits out, no?

dave
Lizard
Posts: 6228
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Paula Radcliffe!

Post by Lizard »

You probably caught him on a bad day! uranus is on the cusp...

[_]> No Liberals were harmed during the making of this post.
Cheeky Chappie UK
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Paula Radcliffe!

Post by Cheeky Chappie UK »

hopefully that's all as the last thing i want to do is offend folk :-(

dave
joe king
Posts: 6789
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Attn Cheekie Chappy

Post by joe king »

'Just because the breasts are eroganous zones surely doesnt mean that therefor anything involving them is sexual'

A human eating the food of another human. And it's not sexual?(That well known surrealist) Desmond Morris I think had a theory that kissing started from a mother softening the food to give to a baby - this was passed by mouth. So lactation of a female is not a turn-on? There are some lactation vids out there that appeal to no-one?

Of course not everything breast-related is 'sexual', but feeding is from a spectators point of view a possible means of a 'sensual experience'.

~~~~~joe king~~~~~
Free pics and movie links of British porn stars
Latest British porn links: [b][url]http://british-uk-porn.com/blog/[/url][/b]
jj
Posts: 28225
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Attn Cheekie Chappy

Post by jj »

There's a common onomastic confusion here between 'sensual' and 'sexual': the former, properly covering all sensory input nice, neutral and nasty, is conflated with the latter.
And almost any sensual experience can be sexually-linked if you squeeze psychoanalytic theory hard enough. Which is why of course it's a busted flush.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
woodgnome
Posts: 2432
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 6:01 pm

Re: Attn Cheekie Chappy

Post by woodgnome »

jj wrote:

> There's a common onomastic confusion here between 'sensual'
> and 'sexual'...

or, in the case of self-justifying paedophiles, an onanistic conflation of convenience.

the same muddled relationship exists vis-a-vis race/culture: that a gun culture exists within an element of a certain racial group does not make it a race issue, otherwise all people of that racial grouping would use guns. it's a cultural issue - or, rather, a micro-cultural issue, as it's only young men living in a few inner city areas who participate.

the same analysis pertains to the 'english disease' of travelling football hooliganism. although, no one ever defines that social issue in terms of the racial origin of the participants. strange, that...
jj
Posts: 28225
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Attn Cheekie Chappy

Post by jj »

....the basic conclusion being: no generalisation is true.
Not even this one.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
Locked