DVD question: NTSC/PAL

A place to socialise and share opinions with other members of the BGAFD Community.
nosey
Posts: 822
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: DVD question: NTSC/PAL

Post by nosey »

That's something to be thankful for. At least it's one over the Yanks!!!
mart
Posts: 4916
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: NTSC/PAL

Post by mart »

You are now entering a fascinating arena for discussion.
Video vs. Film.
When you watch a film (ie celluloid) projected onto a screen, you see the complete image in one "flash" 24 times a second.
When you watch a video you see an image which is scanned from top to bottom 50 times a second.
The two processes may have different physiological results in the retina-optic nerve-brain transmission chain.
The only work I know of relates to filming speeds; I think it was Douglas Trumbull the cinematographer who filmed sequences at 2/3 times the normal speed and its said that the viewers involvement is much greater. It does of course use up far more film.

Mart
The Last Word
Posts: 1644
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Warning: Trumball trivia.

Post by The Last Word »

Yes, he did. The process was called Showscan: 70mm stock shown at 60 frames per second for extreme clarity. Had a trial run in his underrated Brainstorm (a film years ahead of its time), but it never caught on. It seems Trumball grew tired of actual film-making and involved himself with IMAX projects and studio/theme-park amusements (Back to the Future..the ride. That sort of thing). A colossal FX legend, of course.

--
"Let's do it..."
"Let's do it..."
mart
Posts: 4916
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: NTSC/PAL

Post by mart »

Surely film is standard at 16fps(silent) and 24fps(sound).
Trumball's experiment filmed and projected at a faster speed as TLW has just confirmed, so the viewer saw the action at normal "speed".

Mart
NOBBY
Posts: 136
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: DVD question: NTSC/PAL

Post by NOBBY »

Guys,

After everything that has been said remember this, If the source is of Digital Quality and Digitally Encoded MPEG really the question of which is better is pretty achademic. If i ever want to backup any of my DVD's i use software from the internet, and bearing in mind the equipment used to Burn my DVD's i defy anybody to see the difference.

Oh by the way you can if you so wish convert any NTSC Source to PAL and vice versa, even changing region coding.
As the great scholar say's "Anybody who said they are a Brain Surgeon are really a Taxi Driver?"
Locked