Adult Channel - going backwards?

[Richard B]

I wonder if Adult Channel chiefs are getting more prudish?

I've just watched Threesomes - you could hardly see a thing, sadly. Cum Sucking Sluts was better, but you still didn't see much. Better though was some seriously naughty talking by Sarah - seems to be a feature of this series, and it's very welcome.

Some producers seem to have been told to clamp down on any "camera slips" with the result that the programmes can be very tame. You might say why worry at ?9.99 a month - only 30P a day - and that is a reasonable point, but I see what the In Excess people get away with on Panties II and Uniforms and wish the others could follow in the same vein.

It would also be good if the Adult Channel could return to their more relaxed attitude about "camera slips".

The Adult Channel don't have a contact e-mail on their website - can anyone give us contact details for the person/persons to lobby?

[vila]

Nice to know someone else feels the same as I do.

Why worry at ?9.99 a month? A point I've raised before is that the h/c versions go out on Spice Platinum, which most of us don't have access to, for only ?8.25 a month.

And I get accused of talking bullshit when I call TAC and TVX rip-offs!

[vila]

Nice to know someone else feels the same as I do.

Why worry at ?9.99 a month? A point I've raised before is that the h/c versions go out on Spice Platinum, which most of us don't have access to, for only ?8.25 a month.

And I get accused of talking bullshit when I call TAC and TVX rip-offs!

[woodgnome]

and you base this supposition on one programme?

i don't see any evidence for your theory at all. you mention 'uniforms' - a new series which was full of slips - so, no sign of a clampdown there.

what about big jim's new series 'extreme dreams'? he expressed surprise at some of the stuff that was allowed through. and 'michelles slut search' certainly isn't tamer than anything that's gone before it.

some producers play it safer than others but that's just a result of different people having different styles. e.g. phil barry tends to be more conservative when editing stuff for tac, compared to someone like paul scott, imo.

anyway, why would tac tell some producers to clamp down and not others? surely, if they wanted to tighten things up (and why the heck would they?) it would only make sense if they imposed the new regime on everyone?

[c]

yeah, well its still shit!

[alec]

I think they are more likely to risk 'camera slips' in the first programme of a series than in later episodes. This make people watch the later episodes in the hope of more of the same.

[buttsie thankful]

Don't like the content don't watch it.

Want harder action buy some vids.

Stop pissing on about these channels cause it aint going to change the content.

cheers

[HM Murdock]

The only problems i see is TAC is slowly turning to more of a Girl on girl channel which is really off putting in some ways.

Don't get me wrong i love to see Michelle Thorne and Sandy in
action with other hot women, but it is when the non-so hot women
go at it. My advice to TAC is bring in more B/G programs featuring British women and more views will follow.

[Frank]

To contact TAC try
televisionx@nasnet.co.uk

Its actually run by playboy.co.uk
and I once got a very helpful answer about TAC schedules from

Nicola Waite [nicola.waite@playboytv.co.uk]

and their phone number I was given is
Playboy TV 0208 581 7000.

[Chanta Rose]

Haven't you just given out the TVX e-mail address instead on the Adult Channel one?