Jagger's Knighthood

A place to socialise and share opinions with other members of the BGAFD Community.
jj
Posts: 28225
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Jagger's Knighthood

Post by jj »

It's not as if a Dartford Grammar boy would have been raised in poverty: guess he's just money-obsessed.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
IdolDroog
Posts: 1580
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Jagger's Knighthood

Post by IdolDroog »

im not what you could call a mick jagger fan (although he seems ok sometimes in interview) but charlie is fucking fantastic and keiths, well...lets put it this way the stones are keith and charlie really arent they- they are the best spokesmen and musicians :)

and i dont even really like their music, :S
mmm Alex Kramer
steve56
Posts: 13579
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Jagger's Knighthood

Post by steve56 »

goats heads soup from 73 was ok,but never liked dirty work it sounded more like a band imitating the stones .
The Last Word
Posts: 1644
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Jagger's Knighthood

Post by The Last Word »

Bill Wyman was interviewed in The Independent a few saturdays ago, and came across as being quite bitter about the Stones, especially - and predictably - regarding money. Mick 'n' Keef are okay, but nowhere near as entertaining as their Stella Street counterparts, and surely a band's finished when the drummer's the cool one?

--
"Let's do it..."

"Let's do it..."
steve56
Posts: 13579
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Jagger's Knighthood

Post by steve56 »

keith never got off the old heroin habit though,bill did ok he had sex with underage girl and got off if that had been joe piublic he would have been lynched killed etc or pretty beat up
davewells
Posts: 1357
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Jagger's Knighthood

Post by davewells »

Keefs comments were the best. What a load of crap this award system is !
IdolDroog
Posts: 1580
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Jagger's Knighthood

Post by IdolDroog »

it just shows how ridiculous they are tho really because mick got it for "services to entertainment" er....werent the others there since the start too ?! and didnt they actually provide the music. its weird that mick seems to be so different to the others. id be interested to hear terry may elaborate on "mean" even tho there are many twattish stories of him about...the publicity thing u mention just makes you despair really doesnt it. that whole PR system thing should just be a figment of our imaginations much like the "wannabe"...
mmm Alex Kramer
steve56
Posts: 13579
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Jagger's Knighthood

Post by steve56 »

what makes me laugh is noone had a good word for him yrs ago ,now all of a sudden hes in the limelight again,lol.
Locked