Copyright

A read-only and searchable archive of posts made to the BGAFD forum from 11/08/2000 to 14/03/2003.
Daniel

Copyright

Post by Daniel »

Why do some models/producers insist on blowing their tops when they feel that their copyright privilages have been exploited ?

Surely that's the beauty of the internet, where ultimate freedom is expressed and we can all see and view whatever we want, without beurocratic restrictions.

Get a life, and stop complaining and channel your energies more productively and start producing new innovative porn instead!
Chanta Rose

Re: Copyright

Post by Chanta Rose »

I suppose some models are running businesses like everyone else out there. If a model has a website and has content shot exclusively for that site then of course she doesn't want the sets plastered all over free sites...after all that isn't going to get her members or pay her bills!!!

In the case where the model doesn't like that pictures of her are stolen from a site where she has been paid, I'm not sure the problem with that...I suppose if she hates the pics (like I hate the UK video babes pics of me) when I see them posted here it just makes me cringe.
deSade

Re: Copyright

Post by deSade »

Bit of a twatish post Daniel.

Their material is their own IPR (Intellectual Property).

Having someone nick your work, pay you nothing, and laugh in your face is not nice.

Of course piracy goes on. My work (non-porn) has been copied. It really pisses you off though.

I have of course had pirated porn in the past, it used to be often the only way you could get it. But that situation is now changing - so go and support the people who make the material you enjoy so much. Buy originals whenever you can, and don't insult the people who work in the industry by rubbing their faces in your piss-poor attitude.
buttsie

Re: Copyright

Post by buttsie »

Couldn't have said it better myself!!!!

If we all pirated how long do you think the pics and vids would keep going for Daniel,use your head.


cheers
B..Oz
Reepo

Re: Copyright

Post by Reepo »

Numbskull. If youve spent 200 quid on a model then processed your film and maybe hired a location or paid a programmer to get your site going, how do you feel if all of your material appears for free somewhere else?

People are involved in this because its a business, not a charity.
Phil McC

Re: Copyright

Post by Phil McC »

Off with his Head,
Phil McC
buttsie

Re: Copyright

Post by buttsie »

Hey Phil Daniel hasn't got a head

He's talking out of his ass(lucky he wasn't singing out of his ass-clearing the throat and all)

Like someone said on a previous post said its not enough for these people to steal copyright material they have to tell everyone about it to make themselves feel important.

cheers
B...Oz

Ps do me a favour find Wife watcher with Michelle Wright in it and put JJ(MOaning Minnie)out of his misery.
buttsie

Re: Copyright

Post by buttsie »

I was agreeing with Desade,read where my comment is attached too

I totally am against what Daniel posted as i have stated on numerous occasions.

Haven't been called a numbskull for quite a while oh what a feeling you idiot!!

cheers
B...OZ
Phil McC

Re: Copyright

Post by Phil McC »

Buttsie I invited him down to my suite to find it himself, I even bought a load of Kleenex (soft stuff) what more can I do,
Whats the plot with porn out there, I could do with an agent, Penthouse UK will be distributed in OZ this year so we will be high profile,
Phil McC
alec

Re: Copyright

Post by alec »

I think neither of you understand how the hierarchy works in a thread, i.e. Reepo was technically replying to deSade when he meant to reply to Daniel and you assumed he was replying to you. Look at the little lines and the indentations.

Just trying to clarify here. :)
Locked