New Sets on John Mason Studio.com

A read-only and searchable archive of posts made to the BGAFD forum from 11/08/2000 to 14/03/2003.
woodgnome

Re: New Sets on John Mason Studio.com

Post by woodgnome »

ah, i get you. sorry.
webmasterjms@coolpiranha.com

Re: New Sets on John Mason Studio.com

Post by webmasterjms@coolpiranha.com »

Hellooooooooooo
In answer to various questions:

Image size. We decided early on that since broadband wasn't fully introduced into the UK (this is going back almost a year), that we would have to comprimise between loading speed and file size. Yes, the images are smaller than a lot of sites, but on the plus side, there are plenty of them in each webset. Some of the sets run to 60 images in the hardcore section.

Also, back then, John's transparencies were being scanned in by a third party. This was before I got involved, and I have to be honest and say that the quality of those scans was not up to scratch. Some images were dirty, hadn't been properly framed. You name it. That meant that if we had offered them up in a large size, the quality would have been atrocious.

Hardcore stuff.
If you can't find John's hardcore images on the JMS site, you must have damaged your eyesight in the other galleries! All the hardcore sets (boy/girl, girl/girl and orgy stuff) is contained in Masons Shaggers.

We've also introduced the little pop up update on the membership login screen (as was pointed out) which lets us keep members up to speed with the latest updates. Tonight for example I'm off to do more websets for the Shaggers section and added some new ones earlier today. John is threatening to drop off discs containing 6000 new images at any time before he heads off to sunnier climes next week. Once those have been rotated and sized, you can expect them to end up on the site as soon as I can physically do them.

If you've got any feedback about the site, or if there's something specific you want to see, please feel free to email me personally and I'll try and help. We want to make johnmasonstudio.com the foremost Brit porn site, and I think we're getting there.

Thanks for the interest.
marcusallen

Re: New Sets on John Mason Studio.com

Post by marcusallen »

John's got my vote.
He's a fucking wierdo in his own way-but are'nt we all.
He's also a gent.
He's a fucking good photographer. He's also a v.good fucker!!)
He even made ME look good on a couple of occasions-work that one out.(Not sure I ever got paid, did I?)
John Mason

Re: New Sets on John Mason Studio.com

Post by John Mason »

I think you've got my site mixed up with someone else's!
I've never shot a Melanie Reeves or a Claire Green!

John
John Mason

Re: New Sets on John Mason Studio.com

Post by John Mason »

If I remember Marcus, you did the 'gentleman thing' and told me to give your money to the girl!
And for those of you out there who are still trying to work out what the hell we're on about, I shot Marcus and a girl whose name escapes me at the moment, on a boy/girl shoot for Fiesta Black Label about two years ago.
John Mason

Re: New Sets on John Mason Studio.com

Post by John Mason »

Dear Webmaster,

You think you've only got 6000 images to load! That was two weeks ago! I've shot another 2000 since then and that will be around 3000 by the end of the week, and considering I've got 10 girls to shoot in Portugal next week, you'll be uploading pictures for the rest of your life!
I'm also intending to do every possible combination of hard multi girl shoots, so that should stop you from having a social life!
But look at things on the bright side at least I'm not 'in' all of them!!!!!


Love & Kisses
John
buttsie village idiot

Re: New Sets on John Mason Studio.com

Post by buttsie village idiot »

I believe they were under the names of

Melanie Wood and Claire Butland

cheers
B...oz
John Mason

Re: New Sets on John Mason Studio.com

Post by John Mason »

Ah, that explains it! Melanie Wood and Claire Butland are their real names and I only tend to remember girls by their real names. They tend to change their modelling names every other week and it gets to the stage that you need a score card to keep up with who you've worked with and who you haven't!

By the way, the shit resolution thing has been sorted and you'll find that all the hard stuff is now of an acceptable nature. The soft stuff is still in the process of being re-scanned and is about 80% complete. Everything new is obviously up to scratch. The only problem to sort out now is my shoddy camera work..............
Locked