Calm down dear it's only a FORUM?
As I said many posts ago I fully understand your wavering on this issue as the government and the media does appear to change from event to event and there really is no need for you to justify your comments in such great detail. I'm sure everyone reading these posts will understand your sittuation.
Its good that our debate has caused you to give this matter a second thought in the cold light of day.
DG
Anychance of an answer regarding the J Arthur question?
suspected bomber shot 5 times at stockwell
Re: suspected bomber shot 5 times at stockwell
Digi-Guy wrote:
> I'm sure
> everyone reading these posts will understand your sittuation.
No were fucking bored - give it a rest
> I'm sure
> everyone reading these posts will understand your sittuation.
No were fucking bored - give it a rest
quis custodiet ipsos custodes
Re: suspected bomber shot 5 times at stockwell
"They weren't in uniform and his English was probably poor."
Its a bad shame but only batfink with his wings of steel can stop a speeding bullett so us humans must comply with the wishes of the man with a gun.
Its a bumer I know but it has something to do with physiques which I'm sure is the same in any language
DG
Not faster than a speeding bullet
Its a bad shame but only batfink with his wings of steel can stop a speeding bullett so us humans must comply with the wishes of the man with a gun.
Its a bumer I know but it has something to do with physiques which I'm sure is the same in any language
DG
Not faster than a speeding bullet
Re: suspected bomber shot 5 times at stockwell
"No were fucking bored - give it a rest"
So why read the reply?
Sure its rocket science I know but if you have no interest in the author why read his reply?
DG
Did you also know your PC as an OFF button in the bottom left corner?
So why read the reply?
Sure its rocket science I know but if you have no interest in the author why read his reply?
DG
Did you also know your PC as an OFF button in the bottom left corner?
Re: suspected bomber shot 5 times at stockwell
I read it in the off chance it might actually be a constructive post - I was wrong.
quis custodiet ipsos custodes
Re: suspected bomber shot 5 times at stockwell
Ouch, man down and wounded I tells ya wounded
DG
DG
Re: suspected bomber shot 5 times at stockwell
stephen waldorf was mistaken for a escaped criminal in 1982?83?he was shot but survived.
Re: suspected bomber shot 5 times at stockwell
steve56 wrote:
> stephen waldorf was mistaken for a escaped criminal in
> 1982?83?he was shot but survived.
Yes, but he's a salad now.
> stephen waldorf was mistaken for a escaped criminal in
> 1982?83?he was shot but survived.
Yes, but he's a salad now.
Re: suspected bomber shot 5 times at stockwell
fawlty towers 1975?
Re: suspected bomber shot 5 times at stockwell
I suspect that did not occur under a shoot-to-kill policy