New censorship law for the UK

[Heathray]

To be honest any site which promotes beating up women, men or children needs shut down. Sick bastards may get a kick out of it but it is not within the bounds of human decency. Sex is normal, beating the crap out of someone to get aroused isn't.

As for shagging animals leave that to other animals.

[nachovx]

There's a consultation document here

Reads like it was written by a 15 year old, altogether a crock of shit.

If you can be bothered your views would be welcome at

But since these people are not really human in the sense most people know, they wouldn't listen anyway.

[chapel2k]

Ok why`s everyone so concerned about bondage/rape porn and animal porn? The way I see it though is if they want rid of it they should got after the fuckers putting it online, not the innocent punter who stumbles onto it

[nachovx]

That's exactly who they would like to go after, but they can't because most of them live in the free world, where the material is not banned, the sites concerned are perfectly lega and the governments see no reason to curtail freedom between consenting adults - their view is if you don't like it, don't look at it. So in true British (Nazi) style they are going for the scare tactic and the only people they can get at - the people who live within their jurisdiction.

But here's a bit of hypocrisy from the Home Office and shows how they think when racial minorities are involved.

While planning to ban extreme porn, which will more than likely go through unchallenged by the drones in parliament, they are also looking at a drug called CAT. CAT is chewed by mainly Somalians and Ethiopians, who came here as refugees - it is at the moment perfectly legal, although it has effects similar to ecstasy. The drug is banned in the US, where it is regarded as a hard drug, but the main gateway for smuggling it in is from the UK. It sells for ?3 a dose ... but in the US goes for $50 for the same amount and is generating fortunes for organised crime, paying carriers $500 - $1000 to carry a suitcase through US Customs.

Yet the likely result of this Home Office study is to recommend keeping the drug status legal according to most in the know ... yes, that's because the PC brigade is up in arms claiming racial harassment and citing that the recreational use of the drug is enshrined in culture. But the amount of crime centred around the gangs controlling CAT is far more serious than anything that could result from extreme porn and affects many more people.

How many muggers are high on CAT legally, because people who become 'addicted' don't work, they sit in chewing dens for up to 12 hours a day and it leads to conditions like paranoia, which in turn leads to violence. Many arrested people are known to have been under the influence of CAT, but the PC world of police and Home Office they try to bury these figures, while highlighting ONE murderer who had a taste for extreme porn. They are scared to be seen to be oppressing Muslims and would rather let the associated crime (including murders) go on and chalk it down to something else.

[nosey]

If the EU ignores Denmark allowing 15 year olds to access S&M and bestiality yet tells the UK that they cannot deport Muslim clerics for their making inflammatory speeches, why then do they not tell us that we are not
to pass laws limiting our access to view anything we want on the net.

[Marino]

Blimey Heathray. I for once almost agree with all of your posting. Apart from who am i to stop the course of true love, if a woman takes a fancy to my dog, whilst he's pissing up a tree.
Then he is old enough to make his own desicion on whats right or wrong.

On a serious note, I believe that most of us do not agree with the beating of women on film for kicks, so I have no objection to them being filtered out.
What is wrong with just sticking your knob in girls, am I that simple that this act is still enough pleasure.

[eroticartist]

Heathray,
What we are talking about here are images of consenting adults.
Mike Freeman

[nachovx]

Accept the fact that most people in the UK don't actually understand the concept of Freedom of Speech in the way the first amendment in the US works. I'll give Americans one thing, even the most stupid Redneck or right wing bigot can understand that surprising the rights of a minority group is wrong for many reasons - but present the average UK citizen with a story involving sex, violence or abuse (real or role-play) and they're more than willing to curtail their own freedoms by imposing a blanket ban.

[nachovx]

that should read 'suppressing the rights '

[eroticartist]

Hi Nachvox,

Compliments to the poster here for finding out what the authoritarian State thought police are working on now.

I have been a pornographer since 1960 and I honestly believe that these people at the Home Office censorship department Goggins et al have never had really dirty sex. You have to let go of the world to have an orgasm. However any prostitute will tell you what "English" means as a request from a client. A bloody good whipping just like the old boys in the Home Office had at Almer Mater.

This proposed law is in breach of Articles 6 and 10 of ECHR (European Convention ofHuman Rights) to which this government is a signatory.

Mike Freeman