hulk [2003 film]

A place to socialise and share opinions with other members of the BGAFD Community.
Locked
steve56
Posts: 13579
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

hulk [2003 film]

Post by steve56 »

itv showed this last night hardly recongised nick nolte and didnt think it was as good as the 70s tv series starring bll bixby.
Cenobitez
Posts: 1956
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: hulk [2003 film]

Post by Cenobitez »

This film was closer to that the great creator intended tho.

I mean Hulk GREW and got STRONGER as his rage increased, most the other filmsand servies never did that, he stayed the same size.

The film included his Super Jump which i never seen in any others.

The film was closer to the comic in alot of respects but off in others.

Did you also see the Cameo from the Original Hulk ? Lou Ferringo ? as a security guard.

It is said that both love and truth walk hand in hand. But if the need is great enough, can we learn to love a lie?
Cactus Jack
Posts: 207
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: hulk [2003 film]

Post by Cactus Jack »

Lou Ferringo was the bloke with Stan Lee (the creator of the Hulk).

If anybody understood the last 15 minutes, could they explain it to me, please?

!confused!

Are you actually speaking english, or are you just making up words as you go along? I do that too...
steve56
Posts: 13579
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: hulk [2003 film]

Post by steve56 »

yeah i found this version very slow and complex.Brother Blue wrote:

> I'm a massive Hulk fan but I didn't like the movie a great
> deal.
> One thing I couldn't get used to is that in the comics, even at
> his strongest, the Hulk only grew to a maximum height of ten
> feet, yet the movie made him grow to fifteen foot which I
> thought was far to big.
> The CGI was ok, but to me, he looked like Shrek on steroids.
>
> They should have also pitted him against a good villain like
> the Leader.
>
> I recently read that a sequel has been made which is going
> straight to DVD/Video.
>
> Brother Blue
> http://www.brothersblue.com
> http://www.rudehousewives.com
> enquiry@brothersblue.com
Cactus Jack
Posts: 207
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: hulk [2003 film]

Post by Cactus Jack »

It's a shame. It should have been the film that made a star of Eric Bana, after his incedible turn in Chopper.

I remember seeing the teaser trailer when I went to see Spiderman, and thinking it would be fantastic, until I saw that CGI monstrosity. Worst comic book movie ever - and I've watched the Punisher!

And what the hell is with those mutant poodles?

Are you actually speaking english, or are you just making up words as you go along? I do that too...
The Last Word
Posts: 1644
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: hulk [2003 film] & Bond

Post by The Last Word »

A terrible film - one overwrought concept colliding with another, and so forth.

btw - wasn't Eric Bana in the running for James Bond? I know there was much derision when Daniel Craig got the Job (by me for one), but I've not long seen a french trailer for Casino Royale and it looks like they may have nailed it. Exactly what was needed after that invisible car rubbish. Fingers crossed, eh.

"Let's do it..."
Mike-L
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: hulk [2003 film]

Post by Mike-L »

Cactus Jack wrote:

Worst comic book movie ever - and I've watched
> the Punisher!

I dunno, Daredevil comes pretty close lol!!
[b]Free Slut Galleries Here
<http://www.slutsoncloud9.co.uk>[/b]
Locked