>Churchill on the Western Front? Hardly. The First Lord of the Admiralty was not required to fight in the trenches!
No really. He had to resign as First Lord after Gallipoli, and served as an infantry officer for several months in 1916 on the Western Front. As I said, he also saw active service on the North West Frontier, Sudan and South Africa, as well as covering the Spanish-American War in Cuba as a war correspondent. It's safe to say he'd seen just a bit more action than el Phonio.
Blair to make ?25 million
-
Snake Diamond
- Posts: 1889
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Churchill
Keith Rasputin wrote:
> Chamberlain left office in 1940 because he was suffering from
> terminal cancer. He wasn't ousted.
>
> Up to 1940 Churchill had been in two wars, the Boer War and
> First Lord of the A. in the Great War, correct me though....
warren zevon rip wrote:
> Chamberlain was ousted as a direct result of loss of confidence
> due to Norway. And being "in a war" suggests fighting in it,
> not running it.
Actually, you are both correct in your first points.
Chamberlain left because he was Old & Ill with Cancer, as well as a DIRECT Lack of Confidence in his abily to serve as PM during the WW2. He basically was too Old & too Ill to do the job.
> Chamberlain left office in 1940 because he was suffering from
> terminal cancer. He wasn't ousted.
>
> Up to 1940 Churchill had been in two wars, the Boer War and
> First Lord of the A. in the Great War, correct me though....
warren zevon rip wrote:
> Chamberlain was ousted as a direct result of loss of confidence
> due to Norway. And being "in a war" suggests fighting in it,
> not running it.
Actually, you are both correct in your first points.
Chamberlain left because he was Old & Ill with Cancer, as well as a DIRECT Lack of Confidence in his abily to serve as PM during the WW2. He basically was too Old & too Ill to do the job.
Snake Diamond,
Fangs that bite!
Fangs that bite!