why weren't we warned before?

[The Stir Fry Master]

I have read the pr

[The Stir Fry Master]

sorry, my last message was meant to say:

I have read the previous posts and they all connect FC with Sutliffe. This was the reason for my questions.

I wonder if the police have confiscated his database of clients??

[zip]

I heard rumours going back 10 years or so but even a good friend of mine who had been to FC twice, never indicated that he was untoward with her, although I had heard rumours that Sutcliffe used to wear shorts with an obvious hard-on which he used to play with, whilst shooting the models, and that he used to offer girls more money so that he could pose with them.

The problem is that rumours are just that, and without feedback from models themselves nothing else can be gained by these rumours.

Naturally models are reluctant to say anything, and I believe that some of the blame must lie with agencies, who probably still would send girls to him, even with his track record.

For my part, and regardless of what JJ said, anything associated with Sutcliffe must be tainted, and although we deal, photograph, video, produce porn, we must NOT get associated with the likes of Sutcliffe OR his company.

Zipper

[jj]

...sorry,, who are WE, exactly?.........
.....and why should models turn down work: are you prepared to compensate them financially for your 'moral' stand?

[richy]

That's a very valid and important point, IMHO. Apart from the recent lack of catalogues through the post to me, the FC outfit has always given pretty much return of post service, which is considerably more than one can say about other mail order companies!

[richy]

This shouldn't concern you, SFM, as it is illegal to SEND porn through the post, but as a customer, you are RECEIVING it. This particular unenforceable law, like similar ones, is ignored by just about everyone, though.

[magoo]

Its no use all you people feeling guilty for buying from Sutty and trying to make youselves feel better by bleating on about "why werent we told" etc. He is not in prison for anything to do with his work with FC. He is there for indecently assaulting a teenage girl outside of the adult industry and for having child porn on his PC.

The fact that he has an interest in child porn and cant keep is hands to himself is far more serious than him offering models extra cash to fuck them. As Chanta pointed out some models were happy with shagging him for a few extra quid. Other were disgusted by him and never went back.

If you found out the owner of your local pub was a perv would you be saying "oh. why wasnt I told about this before I spent my money in his pub"? He broke the law and is being punished. End of story. Stop moaning about the fact you bought vids from a pervert.

[jj]

...and if they have, are we guilty of paedophilia?
Christ, every post you put in gets thicker.
Put your addy in, chicken, so I can flame you properly.

[jj]

I can send you the recent ones, if you mail me:
.....and please excues the possibly OTT rudeness below: I've just about had it up to the ears with this bloke.

[coconut]

there are a lot opf bad people in the biz. thresses no point ratting on one as very few are completely clean themeselves. people in glass houses and that.